WTF? Now there a presidentially-ordered State of Emergency declared to get the necessary funds and security.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/wor...cost-Obamas-swearing-ceremony-soars-110m.html
The estimated cost is now somewhere around $120Million. Amidst this financial crisis we're in, doesn't it seem like a bit too extravagance is going into this? I mean, seriously: Between the gridlock, chaos, security, set-up, media, etc., etc., it's going to cost a small fortune. I say bring the guy to some secret, undisclosed location and put the whole thing on TV - heck, it'd be a whole lot safer, too.
P.S.
How come there's no outrage this time about the outrageous costs associated with this inauguration? I mean last time, a particular group of folks were literally enraged by the meager $40M price tag. :03:
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/01/20/media_on_inauguration (This is a hilarious flashback
)
P.P.S.
Why is this state of emergency thing not being reported more broadly...Why isn't it on the front page of the NY Times or Washington Post? Why do we have to lean on a British newspaper to find out?
(BTW, that's a rhetorical question...we all know the answer)
:26:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/wor...cost-Obamas-swearing-ceremony-soars-110m.html
The estimated cost is now somewhere around $120Million. Amidst this financial crisis we're in, doesn't it seem like a bit too extravagance is going into this? I mean, seriously: Between the gridlock, chaos, security, set-up, media, etc., etc., it's going to cost a small fortune. I say bring the guy to some secret, undisclosed location and put the whole thing on TV - heck, it'd be a whole lot safer, too.
P.S.
How come there's no outrage this time about the outrageous costs associated with this inauguration? I mean last time, a particular group of folks were literally enraged by the meager $40M price tag. :03:
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/01/20/media_on_inauguration (This is a hilarious flashback

P.P.S.
Why is this state of emergency thing not being reported more broadly...Why isn't it on the front page of the NY Times or Washington Post? Why do we have to lean on a British newspaper to find out?
(BTW, that's a rhetorical question...we all know the answer)
:26: