Looking for "SeaDoo for Dad" - 108' Sunseeker

[C_Spray]

I sent an email to the US Coast Guard asking them if they had any information regarding this incident. They did not reply - AT ALL.

This month's BoatUS magazine had a small article about waking incidents. I wonder if they will be interested?

 

[Ratickle]

I sent an email to the US Coast Guard asking them if they had any information regarding this incident. They did not reply - AT ALL.

This month's BoatUS magazine had a small article about waking incidents. I wonder if they will be interested?

Depends on how much Boat US receives from Bombardier for advertising....:lurk5:

 

[T2x]

This should help explain the situation.

http://www.seriousoffshore.com/forums/showpost.php?p=314825&postcount=25

 

[old377guy]

This should help explain the situation.

http://www.seriousoffshore.com/forums/showpost.php?p=314825&postcount=25

that sheds a lot of light in places where light had not been previously been shed

 

[Ratickle]

that sheds a lot of light in places where light had not been previously been shed

Explains many things......:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

 

[T2x]

This just in..........

http://www.seriousoffshore.com/forums/showpost.php?p=314846&postcount=26

 

[Big Time]

This just in..........

http://www.seriousoffshore.com/forums/showpost.php?p=314846&postcount=26

In a separate conversation the President was asked why he didn't simply order the two segments of the U.S. military to stand down and return to their respective HQ's. "Can I do that?" he replied while searching nervously about for some kind of detailed printed response. :rofl:

 

[Ratickle]

In a separate conversation the President was asked why he didn't simply order the two segments of the U.S. military to stand down and return to their respective HQ's. "Can I do that?" he replied while searching nervously about for some kind of detailed printed response. :rofl:

Along those lines, did you see all the bru ha over the backup prompter for tonight......:sifone:

 

[C_Spray]

It's official - the USCG is out of the picture, stating that "it's not in our jurisdiction". It would have been nice if they had said that on July 5th (two months ago). They say it should be handled by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. I'm not sure if the DNR ever got involved, so it looks like there will be no charges filed - the operator gets off 100% scott-free. Nice.