Headlines
Official... raise your post count thread!!
- Thread starter sellsman11
- Start date
fund razor
Founding Member
Cruz lived.
BAMM.
BAMM.
Last edited:
fund razor
Founding Member
Btw... what happened to the security guard in the (Not Cruz) Vegas shooting? He still missing?
Wrinkleface
Founding Member
I thought he surfaced long ago???
Ratickle
Founding Member / Super Moderator
Yep, dumbass me, I can say DUH. Paddock's body.
fund razor
Founding Member
I'll talk about that case offline. But when I am done, you won't want 60 or 100 round mags. But you won't want to outlaw them either. They suck.
Cruz, I am told, carried 10 round mags because they were easy to conceal.
I don't like comparative murders. And I don't like mixing murderers with my American birth right.
The militia of these free commonwealths,
entitled and accustomed to their arms,
when compared with any possible army,
must be tremendous and irresistible.
Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves?
Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms
each man against his own bosom.
Congress have no power to disarm the militia.
Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier,
are the birth-right of an American ...
the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands
of either the federal or state governments,
but, where I trust in God it will ever remain,
in the hands of the people
--Tench Coxe, Delegate to the Continental Congress, Feb 20, 1788
Bobcat
Founding Member
Mornin Ho's !:seeya:
Paddick was an moslem convert...Seems the FBI is lying again ( I try to misspell their names so they don't get puter hits, especially that dipsh*t hoggy )
Gellar just released another article on Him.
Drove to Marathon Home Depot ...out of Wire and steel ...I normally go online and check availability before going....Ordered some online, should get it by Thursday.
Paddick was an moslem convert...Seems the FBI is lying again ( I try to misspell their names so they don't get puter hits, especially that dipsh*t hoggy )
Gellar just released another article on Him.
Drove to Marathon Home Depot ...out of Wire and steel ...I normally go online and check availability before going....Ordered some online, should get it by Thursday.
fund razor
Founding Member
https://townhall.com/columnists/sco...-without-an-armed-revolt-think-again-n2459868
Liberals consider the cornerstone of the law, a massive forced gun buyback program, a “common sense” approach to what might otherwise be perceived by gun owners as an unwelcome curtailing of traditional American freedoms. Sure, the government may be forcing gun owners to make the transaction, but exchanging money for items IS capitalism, right? And it sure beats the alternative, a Communist-style door-to-door roundup of weapons that both sides agree would likely lead to civil war.
Don’t get me wrong, I think most true Leftists would LOVE to harness the power of the State to crush liberty-minded gun owners by every means necessary, and if a few of the right eggs are broken in the process, so much the better.
***
On this matter, right-wing pundits are correct:
On the topic of whether or not citizens could resist “violent tyranny,” Townhall’s Kurt Schlichter writes, “The short answer is, ‘Yes.’ As Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan all teach, a decentralized insurgency with small arms can effectively confront a modern police/military force ... But the bottom line is that two untrained idiots with handguns shut down Boston. What do you think 100 million Americans – many trained and some battle-tested – could do with their rifles?”
“There is no other way around it: The mandatory confiscation of the American citizenry’s guns would involve tens of thousands of heavily armed federal agents going door-to-door to demand of millions of Americans that they surrender their guns. That. Is. Not. Going. To. Happen,” opines National Review’s Mark Wright.
“Make no mistake, armed rebellion would be the consequence,” writes Varad Mehta for The Federalist in a piece that’s par for the course when it comes to most thinking on the right. “Armed men would be dispatched to confiscate guns, they would be met by armed men, and blood would be shed.
***
And yet, they do want more and more laws on the books, and the more draconian, obscure, and hard to keep track of, the better. But why?
Here’s the answer, and it should scare every gun owner in the country:
They want to make de facto criminals out of the majority of the gun owning population.
That way, they can essentially pick us off, one by one.
Liberals consider the cornerstone of the law, a massive forced gun buyback program, a “common sense” approach to what might otherwise be perceived by gun owners as an unwelcome curtailing of traditional American freedoms. Sure, the government may be forcing gun owners to make the transaction, but exchanging money for items IS capitalism, right? And it sure beats the alternative, a Communist-style door-to-door roundup of weapons that both sides agree would likely lead to civil war.
Don’t get me wrong, I think most true Leftists would LOVE to harness the power of the State to crush liberty-minded gun owners by every means necessary, and if a few of the right eggs are broken in the process, so much the better.
***
On this matter, right-wing pundits are correct:
On the topic of whether or not citizens could resist “violent tyranny,” Townhall’s Kurt Schlichter writes, “The short answer is, ‘Yes.’ As Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan all teach, a decentralized insurgency with small arms can effectively confront a modern police/military force ... But the bottom line is that two untrained idiots with handguns shut down Boston. What do you think 100 million Americans – many trained and some battle-tested – could do with their rifles?”
“There is no other way around it: The mandatory confiscation of the American citizenry’s guns would involve tens of thousands of heavily armed federal agents going door-to-door to demand of millions of Americans that they surrender their guns. That. Is. Not. Going. To. Happen,” opines National Review’s Mark Wright.
“Make no mistake, armed rebellion would be the consequence,” writes Varad Mehta for The Federalist in a piece that’s par for the course when it comes to most thinking on the right. “Armed men would be dispatched to confiscate guns, they would be met by armed men, and blood would be shed.
***
And yet, they do want more and more laws on the books, and the more draconian, obscure, and hard to keep track of, the better. But why?
Here’s the answer, and it should scare every gun owner in the country:
They want to make de facto criminals out of the majority of the gun owning population.
That way, they can essentially pick us off, one by one.
fund razor
Founding Member
Good morning.
phragle
Charter Member
My sister is selling her boat if anybody is into fishing or whatever.....
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Classic-26...958436?hash=item33e4bd87e4:g:s9YAAOSwoX5ap-dP
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Classic-26...958436?hash=item33e4bd87e4:g:s9YAAOSwoX5ap-dP
fund razor
Founding Member
10 foot beam is nice. That is a nice boat for the age.
Similar threads
