DollaBill
New member
I dont know about liberals Frank, but there is a.. let's say... "connection" between Ben's actiivities and several members of our sport
. FREE BEN :sifone:
Headlines
Freebenkramer.com?
- Thread starter Dude! Sweet!
- Start date
I dont know about liberals Frank, but there is a.. let's say... "connection" between Ben's actiivities and several members of our sport
. FREE BEN :sifone:
DAREDEVIL
Banned
I dont know about liberals Frank, but there is a.. let's say... "connection" between Ben's actiivities and several members of our sport
FREE BEN :sifone:
HAHAHA:rofl::USA:
Expensive Date
New member
DAREDEVIL
Banned
right,,,where have u been ???:rofl:
Geronimo36
Charter Member
I dont know about liberals Frank, but there is a.. let's say... "connection" between Ben's actiivities and several members of our sport
FREE BEN :sifone:
connections, informants, it's all the same!
Don't stop Him, He's on a roll......
Geronimo36
Charter Member
..
Opium dude, get it right! Also, it was "alleged", not "reported"!
..
Classic post!
Classic post!!
Geronimo36
Charter Member
So.....since it's the history channel....post some of the hard facts and not allegations, rumors, hearsay etc.!
Trivia question; Why is ben in jail, what was his prosecuted for?
Remember folks, there's no room for thruth on the internet!
Trivia question; Why is ben in jail, what was his prosecuted for?
Remember folks, there's no room for thruth on the internet!
DAREDEVIL
Banned
So.....since it's the history channel....post some of the hard facts and not allegations, rumors, hearsay etc.!
Trivia question; Why is ben in jail, what was his prosecuted for?
Remember folks, there's no room for thruth on the internet!
Money Laundering
DAREDEVIL
Banned
Geronimo36
Charter Member
Read the whole document...that's only part, they were convicted for RICO AND Travel Act violations, all of which are a result of trafficing 1/2 mil pounds of weed from 1982 - 1987.... :seeya:
The list was long and wide, that's why "no-contest"..
Now he's claiming "double jeapordy" which he already tried an appeal and failed so he could get a re-sentence on a technicality and get out on time served...:lurk5:
Like Chris said, I don't think it'll happen.
http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F3/73/1067/557167/
Under RICO, a person who is a member of an enterprise that has committed any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $250,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." RICO also permits a private individual harmed by the actions of such an enterprise to file a civil suit; if successful, the individual can collect treble damages.
* In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(a)(2)(B)(i) and 2.
(a) shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both.
(B) shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both.
being citizens of the United States, did knowingly and willfully transport, and attempt to transport monetary instruments and funds from a place in the United States to and through a place outside the United States by performing the following activities, among others:
1. Causing the transportation of Bank of Beverly Hills cashier's check # 85810 in the amount of $9,500,000 from California to Switzerland on or about February 17, 1987; and
2. Causing the transportation of $9,500,000 from Switzerland to Luxembourg on or about October 14, 1987; and
3. Causing the transportation of $8,500,000 from Luxembourg to Liechtenstein on or about November 16, 1987; and
4. Causing the transportation of approximately $4,000,000 in cash from Liechtenstein to Switzerland on or about November 16, 1987;knowing that the monetary instruments and funds involved in the transportation represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity and knowing that the transportation was designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of the specified unlawful activity.
Geronimo36
Charter Member
Then you have this little piece of info....
http://openjurist.org/955/f2d/479
required by § 848(b), Lanier, Kramer and Fischer were each sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Pursuant to §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), Lanier and Kramer were sentenced concurrently to forty years imprisonment, Fischer was sentenced concurrently to thirty-five years imprisonment, and Bell was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. Lanier was also sentenced to serve five years for the violation of § 371, to run consecutively to his sentence under §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). In addition, forfeiture judgments were entered against Lanier and Kramer in the amount of $60,000,000 each and against Fischer in the amount of $30,000,000. Appellants raise numerous challenges to their convictions. We find their arguments unpersuasive and affirm in all respects
http://openjurist.org/955/f2d/479
required by § 848(b), Lanier, Kramer and Fischer were each sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Pursuant to §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), Lanier and Kramer were sentenced concurrently to forty years imprisonment, Fischer was sentenced concurrently to thirty-five years imprisonment, and Bell was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. Lanier was also sentenced to serve five years for the violation of § 371, to run consecutively to his sentence under §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). In addition, forfeiture judgments were entered against Lanier and Kramer in the amount of $60,000,000 each and against Fischer in the amount of $30,000,000. Appellants raise numerous challenges to their convictions. We find their arguments unpersuasive and affirm in all respects
Last edited:
Geronimo36
Charter Member
POST OF THE DAY!!!! :rofl::rofl:
"The seventh transaction occurred in November 1986. The appellants imported a "bargeload" of approximately 130,000 pounds of marijuana to San Francisco. "
"The seventh transaction occurred in November 1986. The appellants imported a "bargeload" of approximately 130,000 pounds of marijuana to San Francisco. "
phragle
Charter Member
DAREDEVIL
Banned
Damn,,,looks like they needed some over there bad !!!!:sifone:
Geronimo36
Charter Member
Apache's were to small....they may have worked in the beginning but he quickly upgraded to barges and tankers..... :rofl::rofl:
Similar threads
