I spent about an hour with Fred going over literally every piece of what's inside of it. The short version- it's a quantum leap forward in every way. There wasn't a single thing I could take issue with.
Yeah, they wouldn't be a third less than the 1075. Would be nice though.
If you calculate in dollar-per-horsepower and the savings on the significant extension of time-between-rebuilds, their price vs the 1075 is respectable.
I spent about an hour with Fred going over literally every piece of what's inside of it. The short version- it's a quantum leap forward in every way. There wasn't a single thing I could take issue with.
Fred told me they estimate between 200 and 300 hours between refresh. So they grabbed the number in the middle and they call it 250.
The new ECU has 10 times the processing power of the one on the 1075. They collect enough data that they could potentially assemble an algorithm based on data gathered and stored during every second of usage that could give you a "time remaining" piece of data. So the guy that runs 60% all the time and once in a while bumps it to max sees different data that the guy that firewalls it at every opportunity. This isn't something he told me they're doing. This is something that could potentially be done in the future.
I was told there isn't a single off-the-shelf part in the engine. Obviously they looked at every piece of performance V-8 architecture in designing it so I'm going to guess there are some shared ideas from other platforms.
Me personally...
I would like to see just two pipes exiting the transom. The mercury display shows this rigging.
Also I would like the tailpipe lower and on each side of the drive if possible. Less soot on transom this way, cleaner look in my opinion, and quieter.
The Merc display was their underwater exhaust exit.
In talking about the engine management system of this new engine, they're in so much greater control of engine function, I'm pretty sure you'll see alot less soot.