Well then I guess I should thank you for letting me live in your world because obviously your point of view is all that matters or is right. So thank you.
With that out of the way, I'm just not sure what problems you are referring to that (can and should be explained) in a simple factual Q&A outline. I guess one of the things that concerns me is whom gets to produce this Q&A (factual) outline and unless it is me, do I have to take it for the gospel? After reading your posts I can't believe you could believe anything that anyone writes that boils a complicated problem down to it's simplest, most easy to understand form - unless it is you providing the answers. But, I get that, I'm the same way. But if this thread is any indication of how that process would work - we are in trouble. Because if you are the one providing the answers, I don't buy them; and conversely, if I am providing the answers you are further away from buying them than I am yours. So unless one of us is appointed the benevolent dictator, what do we do? If we are living under our form of government, we have to do something that more than likely drives you nuts - we compromise.
I agree with you that government is too big and is trying to gain more and more access into my personal life. I don't like it either. As I stated in my first post, my preference would be to move our form of government to a dictatorship - as long as I am the dictator. We could get some problems solved then.
And just as a side note, I kind of thought the tired maxim like "you can't just point at "the problem" due to the multifaceted nature of complex systems and the causal relationships they hold with one another" was conveying a deep thought with minimum verbiage. But, I'm not really all that surprised, or upset, that you didn't like it. I respect your right to your opinion, even if it doesn't match mine.
