Long Duck Dong aka LDD / Steve Thomas / Extreme Remarketing

[PARADOX]

Yes there are. But this group has gotten guys to cough up checks to people they previously told to F-off.

Yeeah.. It's time I need these guys. I been trying to resolve my prop issue that I got screwd almost 8-9 months. I will post some in a few days. I need some rest. Waaaaayyy to much traveling in the last few weeks.
I am glad that most of the comp. cowboys stay somewhere else. :03:

 

[Nordic95]

Although I do agree, neither apply to this circumstance. Based on what I have seen, read, and followed there is nothing criminal here so no chance at prison. LDD is young so I dont see death in his future unless an unfortunate situation was to happen. Then again I read lots of people post talking about paying LDD a visit, that did not happen either. Im not here to pick sides on either parties decisions but lets keep what facts we do know straight. I for one would like to see this move on to the next chapter, if there is going to be one as suggested.

As a common knowledge kind of guy and trust me I'm no expert. I agree with a post I saw on this thread or on OSO, cant remember where I read it. Either the buyer has a crappy attorney who has drug his feet in not getting LDD served, or the attorney knows there is nothing there and these are all empty threats in an attempt to get LDD to settle. If I was a betting type guy I would put my money on LDD not settling.

Good Luck to all invloved, until the next chapter.

So MR RANDOM BOATER I guess you havent spoken to Steve lately.....I wonder what he could be doing today??????????Rumor has it the new chapter is being written as we type,but what do I know.....


ANTWAN

 

[phragle]

????????????????????//

 

[99fever27]

Should we all guess or are you going to provide some information?

 

[40FlatDeck]

hey guys i personally know the man and think he is a stand up guy along with a few others on this site . I have to say regardless of what everybody thinks we should just give it a rest . My god man how long can you drag something out and not act like a bunch of bickering hens .:rant::moon::huh::banghead:

I have known about LDD from all of the threads. I think what he did is absolutely wrong.

I was going to contact you about doing some interior work on my Skater, as the boat is there now, but if you really think LDD is a stand up guy, I'll pass.

Erik

 

[phragle]

Nordic has been here since Nov. 11 posts, 64% are about LDD and he is being cryptic..

I am not saying good or bad... but I am saying there is Alterior motive behind his posts.

If you have something to say, please say it. this isn't 6th grade "I have a secret" time.

 

[randomboater]

So MR RANDOM BOATER I guess you havent spoken to Steve lately.....I wonder what he could be doing today??????????Rumor has it the new chapter is being written as we type,but what do I know.....


ANTWAN

I did run into him Tuesday in Atlanta at the car auction, spoke with him briefly. He did mention quite a few things regarding the situation and I will keep them to myself as I dont need to take a chance at a knock at my door so I can get served and sued.

You and many others have thrown out a lot of words that if prostock does not win his case, your words will come back to haunt you and your door will be knocked on by someone serving you and that came straight from Steve's mouth at the car auction.

There was an attempt to serve him last Friday but he already left his house is what he told me. He went and picked up the papers on Monday morning. He has his papers and is moving forward from what he told me, there is much more that I dont need to disclose. Just know this is being taken very seriously by a well known local legal team that the plantiff's attorney will get to meet very soon. I sincerely hope the plantiff picked a great attorney, he will need it against LDD's people...

 

[phragle]

oh man...the dream team is in the house!!

 

[Buoy]

oh man...the dream team is in the house!!

They dug up Johnny Cochran?:sifone:

 

[phragle]

a little Febreeze, some star bucks and he is good to go

 

[Nordic95]

I did run into him Tuesday in Atlanta at the car auction, spoke with him briefly. He did mention quite a few things regarding the situation and I will keep them to myself as I dont need to take a chance at a knock at my door so I can get served and sued.

You and many others have thrown out a lot of words that if prostock does not win his case, your words will come back to haunt you and your door will be knocked on by someone serving you and that came straight from Steve's mouth at the car auction.

There was an attempt to serve him last Friday but he already left his house is what he told me. He went and picked up the papers on Monday morning. He has his papers and is moving forward from what he told me, there is much more that I dont need to disclose. Just know this is being taken very seriously by a well known local legal team that the plantiff's attorney will get to meet very soon. I sincerely hope the plantiff picked a great attorney, he will need it against LDD's people...

So this great team is also his divorse team?????

 

[YankeY]

They dug up Johnny Cochran?:sifone:

...if the glove don't fit; you must aquit:sifone:

 

[Buoy]

...if the glove don't fit; you must aquit:sifone:

"who am I"??

"I'm Johny Cochran, wearing a stocking hat"

The who am I part still cracks me up.
A detroit radio station used to play the clip of that for a give away contest "who am I" - and they played the tape of Cochran saying it.
Hilarious.
YankeY - any word on anything? - pm me.

 

[randomboater]

So this great team is also his divorse team?????

No they are not the same attorneys.

 

[Chris]

I know what "really good" attorneys cost. Why would anyone in their right mind spend that kind of money on something as small-dollar as this?

You know what's really fun? Watching a smart judge disassemble some clown's "judgment-proof" strategies. Watching his and his spouse's faces as he signs order after order nullifying asset-concealing transactions and piercing corporate veils. Judges see a non-stop stream of scumbags and amateur attornies. In my experience, they seem to take pleasure in taking guys like this to the woodshed, legally speaking. The best one? Watching as deputies tag all their life's possessions and inventory them for the Sheriff's sale. Watching the wife being handcuffed and escorted out by a baliff on a contempt charge is a close second.

Court can be expensive, but it can yield some satisfying moments. Especially if you're right.

 

[fund razor]

boatme, when I had my problem one year ago, The people on the site that made negative comments were people that had never met me or had not done business with me. I am friends with alot of people on this site and the other one but as you say the computer rambo's speak lots of crap but it never goes anywhere. There were a couple of jerkoffs that I will not name that I PM'd and offered to drive to there house if they had a personal problem with me and as you can expect they declined. The age of computers has given people the confidence to talk crap about someone else without worrying about any reprocussions. What happened to the old days when if you had a problem with someone the two of you just went out back and solved the problem.

That's true. I have to endure all kinds of grief from these little chumps on the internet but NOT in real life... go figure.
But don't forget the emotional response can be very strong when you watch the video of the boat being hooked up in the night and then you hear that it was sent through a chipper. I can close my eyes and see it.... and it makes me wonder when the bogeyman will come for my boat in the night.
They hung horsethieves in the old days, and guys who were great, wonderful, super guys who got involved knowingly or unknowingly got strung up too. Don't blame the average joe for associating you with your "problem one year ago."
On another note, you hauled my current boat from Miami to Delaware for the last owner, and all went great. So, that's an association too.

 

[Tony]

I know what "really good" attorneys cost. Why would anyone in their right mind spend that kind of money on something as small-dollar as this?

You know what's really fun? Watching a smart judge disassemble some clown's "judgment-proof" strategies. Watching his and his spouse's faces as he signs order after order nullifying asset-concealing transactions and piercing corporate veils. Judges see a non-stop stream of scumbags and amateur attornies. In my experience, they seem to take pleasure in taking guys like this to the woodshed, legally speaking. The best one? Watching as deputies tag all their life's possessions and inventory them for the Sheriff's sale. Watching the wife being handcuffed and escorted out by a baliff on a contempt charge is a close second.

Court can be expensive, but it can yield some satisfying moments. Especially if you're right.

Another great joy is making the other side look like total phucktards after they have just laid out their trump card druing a cross exam and its so obvious that the balif has to cough to hide his own laugh. Its kinda like the ultimate b!tch slap.:26:

 

[Nordic95]

Another great joy is making the other side look like total phucktards after they have just laid out their trump card druing a cross exam and its so obvious that the balif has to cough to hide his own laugh. Its kinda like the ultimate b!tch slap.:26:

That is great,But we have the ultimate ***** slap waiting in our back pocket...I cant wait till court,even if we lose it will be worth it to see the reactions of the actions that are taking place now....

 

[phragle]

I was called as a witness in a civil case once, basically airtight before hand, the judge probably crossed a couple lines out of frustration...

it was between a friend and his mom, unfortnate when family ends up in court ahgainst each other but anyways, when my friends mom got divorced, part of the divorce was that when my friend turned 18, half the house was to be put in his name (his mom got the house) that never happened, eventually at 25 he took his mom to court over it.

at one point the judge stopped proceedings and looked at chucks mom and said, "you continually state that it says in the divorce decree that it was at your option, Ms. dimasse, you have the official decree infront of you, please SHOW me where it says that"

chuck's mom "it's not in that one it's in the other one"

judge " that is the final decree, thats the one that counts"

chuck's mom "but it's (cut off by judge)

judge " it is NOT in the final, it does not exist, you will not refer to it exisiting again"

chucks mom "but..."

Judge "ms dimassi, does the word contempt man ANYTHING to you?'


and in the summation the judge said "according to the testimony of ms. dimossi, that is IF you believe the testimony of miss dimassi



final outcome, judge awarded soul ownership to my friend and ordered the second his mom had on the house to be refied so it no longer was attached to the property with 90 days to vacate, all conditional on my friend giving his mom $10k (1/4 the value of the house at the time of the divorce. he did that in heartbeat, being in San diego he got a $350k house that just had major remodeling (paid for with a large chunk of the second) for $10k. Chuck didn't get legal fees though, the judge said "you just won the lottery, your gonna have to pay for the ticket though"

I really the only reason he got the whole house was because of his mom's stupidity in court ad constantly pissing off the judge.

 

[Buoy]

I was called as a witness in a civil case once, basically airtight before hand, the judge probably crossed a couple lines out of frustration...

it was between a friend and his mom, unfortnate when family ends up in court ahgainst each other but anyways, when my friends mom got divorced, part of the divorce was that when my friend turned 18, half the house was to be put in his name (his mom got the house) that never happened, eventually at 25 he took his mom to court over it.

at one point the judge stopped proceedings and looked at chucks mom and said, "you continually state that it says in the divorce decree that it was at your option, Ms. dimasse, you have the official decree infront of you, please SHOW me where it says that"

chuck's mom "it's not in that one it's in the other one"

judge " that is the final decree, thats the one that counts"

chuck's mom "but it's (cut off by judge)

judge " it is NOT in the final, it does not exist, you will not refer to it exisiting again"

chucks mom "but..."

Judge "ms dimassi, does the word contempt man ANYTHING to you?'


and in the summation the judge said "according to the testimony of ms. dimossi, that is IF you believe the testimony of miss dimassi



final outcome, judge awarded soul ownership to my friend and ordered the second his mom had on the house to be refied so it no longer was attached to the property with 90 days to vacate, all conditional on my friend giving his mom $10k (1/4 the value of the house at the time of the divorce. he did that in heartbeat, being in San diego he got a $350k house that just had major remodeling (paid for with a large chunk of the second) for $10k. Chuck didn't get legal fees though, the judge said "you just won the lottery, your gonna have to pay for the ticket though"

I really the only reason he got the whole house was because of his mom's stupidity in court ad constantly pissing off the judge.

So, the guy kicked his own Mother out of the house for a few bucks?
Or am I reading this wrong?