Long Duck Dong aka LDD / Steve Thomas / Extreme Remarketing

[Audiofn]

I think that we are going to know what happened to Rice Hauler before we know what happens with this

 

[boomer35]

any word?

 

[Laken]

I heard that the two parties are currently waiting for the courts to issue us a date.

 

[randomboater]

I heard that the two parties are currently waiting for the courts to issue us a date.

I heard Nordic95 was tired of being billed by Prostock's attorney for phone calls to LDD's attorney.

 

[phragle]

mazing how people just lurk and post in this thread... mind boggeling actually...

 

[Twin27Advantage]

I heard Nordic95 was tired of being billed by Prostock's attorney for phone calls to LDD's attorney.

***EDITED***

:beatdeadhorse5:

 

[Ratickle]

mazing how people just lurk and post in this thread... mind boggeling actually...

Isn't it though....


Every once in a while I look in when it pops up hoping to see an end.

 

[Chris]

We can be civil or we can close the thread. You guys choose.

 

[Offshore Ginger]

We can be civil or we can close the thread. You guys choose.

Chris you already know what i think .:rofl::rofl:

 

[Skullkrusher]

I've never seen two guys who deserved each other more.

 

[randomboater]

I heard that the two parties are currently waiting for the courts to issue us a date.

if this is true it is going to be a long wait and a drawn out ordeal. If Nordic is complaining about being billed for phone calls now he is in for a shocker by the end of the case, assuming they see it through.

LDD was served some 60-90 days ago and most civil cases take over 3 years to resolve especially if there is a trial involved. this is just the beginning of a long process that is going to cost both parties some time and money.

I see both sides of the story and understand where each person stands and why they are standing there. Its unfortunate that it doesnt seem like a settlement is in the cards for this case so I like many others will wait and see what happens.

 

[phragle]

WE all know what happened...we all know its in litigation... I'm all in favor of closing it untill we have some actual news..like a resolution. This post is inhabited by members who have joined for no other reason than to cause trouble.

 

[fund razor]

This post [thread] is inhabited by members who have joined for no other reason than to cause trouble.

So, you are saying that you are in favor of closing the asylum and kicking all the patients out into the public?

 

[phragle]

hell yeah!!

 

[fund razor]

hell yeah!!

That's a very gonzo answer.

 

[phragle]

Fundy...your more fun than my lawyer..we must do ether together soon...

 

[fund razor]

I will pick you up in the Shark.

 

[cig1988]

I started this thread for info only! The mud slinging needs to stop. As Chris said be civil and do not post any negativity here.

 

[randomboater]

I started this thread for info only! The mud slinging needs to stop. As Chris said be civil and do not post any negativity here.

I hardly think this thread was started for informational purposes only based on your very first post that got the thread started, but opinions are like...well you know and can figure out the rest.

I personally see no problem with posting a good or bad buying experience with someone. The issue I have with this last and first post is you were not a part of this dealing so posting your initial opinion that is far from a neutral is viewed as slinging mud in my book, hence your calling the kettle black and being a hipocrit on your own thread. Thats not to mention the other things you have said on other threads. Do as I say, not as I do?

There were a lot of want to be experts and internet want to be lawyers who jumped on this when the story first broke out. Its one thing to state your opinion from a buying experience with someone. Its another to trash someone in which you had no dealings with at all. I respect that you took it upon yourself to start an informational thread but you slung the first handful of mud and you cant exactly put the cat back in the bag now. I appreciate that Chris has asked things to be civil now though.

 

[stecz20]

I hardly think this thread was started for informational purposes only based on your very first post that got the thread started, but opinions are like...well you know and can figure out the rest.

I personally see no problem with posting a good or bad buying experience with someone. The issue I have with this last and first post is you were not a part of this dealing so posting your initial opinion that is far from a neutral is viewed as slinging mud in my book, hence your calling the kettle black and being a hipocrit on your own thread. Thats not to mention the other things you have said on other threads. Do as I say, not as I do?

There were a lot of want to be experts and internet want to be lawyers who jumped on this when the story first broke out. Its one thing to state your opinion from a buying experience with someone. Its another to trash someone in which you had no dealings with at all. I respect that you took it upon yourself to start an informational thread but you slung the first handful of mud and you cant exactly put the cat back in the bag now. I appreciate that Chris has asked things to be civil now though.

you made 12 posts in this forum, all on this thread.. talk about having an agenda...:seeya::seeya: