Headlines
The morning after, now what?
- Thread starter fund razor
- Start date
Ratickle
Founding Member / Super Moderator
So, everyone has been saying the fake earring/ear piece is a bunch of crap. Here is the statement from the company who makes those:
Now, the company which manufactures the bluetooth earrings at the heart of the "baseless" theory has weighed in on the saga.
“We do not know whether Mrs Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it” Icebach Sound managing director Malte Iversen told Just the News on Wednesday.
Does that make you go Hmmmmmmmmm?
Now, the company which manufactures the bluetooth earrings at the heart of the "baseless" theory has weighed in on the saga.
“We do not know whether Mrs Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it” Icebach Sound managing director Malte Iversen told Just the News on Wednesday.
Does that make you go Hmmmmmmmmm?
Ratickle
Founding Member / Super Moderator
The moderators lied against Trump? Was anyone surprised?
With fact-checks like these, how does truth stand a chance?
ABC News has been widely criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir. Even liberal outlets acknowledged that the two journalists seemed inclined to “fact check” only Trump. In the meantime, they allowed clearly false statements from Harris go unchallenged.
One of the most notable slap downs by ABC followed Trump commenting that crime rates have drastically risen during the Biden-Harris administration. Muir immediately balked and declared: “As you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is coming down in this country.”
Harris and her allies have been repeating the claim by ABC. But the actual statistics show that Trump was right. The Justice Department’s released survey found that, under the Biden administration, there has been a significant increase in crime. Violent crime was up 37 percent from 2020 to 2023, rape is up 42 percent, robbery is up 63 percent and stranger violence is up 61 percent. Other reports had shown startling increases such as a doubling of carjackings in D.C. in 2023.
Trump also hit Harris on her no-limits position on abortion rights, allowing women the right to abort a baby up to the moment of birth. Trump said Harris supports laws allowing abortions in “the seventh month, the eighth month, [and] the ninth month,” to which Harris retorted: “C’mon,” “no,” and “that’s not true,”
The hosts again said that Trump was making up his criticism of late-term abortions, including the risk of babies being born but allowed to die.
But in fact, many states, including Minnesota under Gov. Tim Walz (D), protect the right of a woman to abort a baby into the ninth month. While it is often said that this is left to the mother and her doctor, the law gives the decision to the mother.
Late-term abortions are relatively rare, but they do occur. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report estimated in 2019 that about 4,882 abortions were performed that year at least 21 weeks or later into pregnancy.
More than a dozen states, in fact, allow on-demand abortions after a baby is viable and can even survive outside of the womb. Nine of those states permit abortions throughout the entirety of pregnancy. Harris has supported these state laws and certainly did not answer the question on what limits she would support.
With fact-checks like these, how does truth stand a chance?
ABC News has been widely criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir. Even liberal outlets acknowledged that the two journalists seemed inclined to “fact check” only Trump. In the meantime, they allowed clearly false statements from Harris go unchallenged.
One of the most notable slap downs by ABC followed Trump commenting that crime rates have drastically risen during the Biden-Harris administration. Muir immediately balked and declared: “As you know, the FBI says overall violent crime is coming down in this country.”
Harris and her allies have been repeating the claim by ABC. But the actual statistics show that Trump was right. The Justice Department’s released survey found that, under the Biden administration, there has been a significant increase in crime. Violent crime was up 37 percent from 2020 to 2023, rape is up 42 percent, robbery is up 63 percent and stranger violence is up 61 percent. Other reports had shown startling increases such as a doubling of carjackings in D.C. in 2023.
Trump also hit Harris on her no-limits position on abortion rights, allowing women the right to abort a baby up to the moment of birth. Trump said Harris supports laws allowing abortions in “the seventh month, the eighth month, [and] the ninth month,” to which Harris retorted: “C’mon,” “no,” and “that’s not true,”
The hosts again said that Trump was making up his criticism of late-term abortions, including the risk of babies being born but allowed to die.
But in fact, many states, including Minnesota under Gov. Tim Walz (D), protect the right of a woman to abort a baby into the ninth month. While it is often said that this is left to the mother and her doctor, the law gives the decision to the mother.
Late-term abortions are relatively rare, but they do occur. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report estimated in 2019 that about 4,882 abortions were performed that year at least 21 weeks or later into pregnancy.
More than a dozen states, in fact, allow on-demand abortions after a baby is viable and can even survive outside of the womb. Nine of those states permit abortions throughout the entirety of pregnancy. Harris has supported these state laws and certainly did not answer the question on what limits she would support.
Ratickle
Founding Member / Super Moderator
What pieces of dog s_hit are in the Democrats house.
The U.S. House passed a bill to deport illegal foreign nationals convicted of domestic violence and sex-related offenses, including sex crimes against children, but not without controversy.
Nearly all Democrats voted against the bill filed by U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, the Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act, on Thursday.
The bill passed by a vote of 266-158; 215 Republicans and 51 Democrats voted for it. Seven members didn’t vote; 158 Democrats voted against it.
“We are fed up with headlines about women losing their lives or becoming victims of assailants who trespassed into our country illegally under the Biden-Harris border crisis,” Mace said. “This legislation sends a strong message: if you are an illegal who has committed acts of violence against women, you will not find sanctuary here.”
Mace also posted a video on X, saying, “Every member voting against this bill shows the American people they care more about illegal aliens than our women and children.”
The bill would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act “to provide that aliens who have been convicted of or who have committed sex offenses or domestic violence are inadmissible and deportable.” This includes stalking, child abuse, child neglect, child abandonment, violation of protective orders, including credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, and conspiracy to commit a sex offense grounds for deportation, according to the bill language.
It also includes crimes defined in the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006: child sex offenders, sexual predators, child sex traffickers, using minors in a sexual performance, soliciting a minor to practice prostitution, producing or distributing child pornography, transporting with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, among others.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=89918c9c15da4537950472466f5c5137&ei=259
The U.S. House passed a bill to deport illegal foreign nationals convicted of domestic violence and sex-related offenses, including sex crimes against children, but not without controversy.
Nearly all Democrats voted against the bill filed by U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, the Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act, on Thursday.
The bill passed by a vote of 266-158; 215 Republicans and 51 Democrats voted for it. Seven members didn’t vote; 158 Democrats voted against it.
“We are fed up with headlines about women losing their lives or becoming victims of assailants who trespassed into our country illegally under the Biden-Harris border crisis,” Mace said. “This legislation sends a strong message: if you are an illegal who has committed acts of violence against women, you will not find sanctuary here.”
Mace also posted a video on X, saying, “Every member voting against this bill shows the American people they care more about illegal aliens than our women and children.”
The bill would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act “to provide that aliens who have been convicted of or who have committed sex offenses or domestic violence are inadmissible and deportable.” This includes stalking, child abuse, child neglect, child abandonment, violation of protective orders, including credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, and conspiracy to commit a sex offense grounds for deportation, according to the bill language.
It also includes crimes defined in the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006: child sex offenders, sexual predators, child sex traffickers, using minors in a sexual performance, soliciting a minor to practice prostitution, producing or distributing child pornography, transporting with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, among others.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=89918c9c15da4537950472466f5c5137&ei=259
Ratickle
Founding Member / Super Moderator
What scum!!
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Virginia on Friday over an executive order removing illegal migrants off the state’s voter rolls allegedly too close to Election Day.
Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed Executive Order 35, which codifies election security measures including voter list maintenance, on Aug. 7. The lawsuit alleged the Virginia State Board of Elections and Virginia Commissioner of Elections Susan Beals violated the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which says states may not clean up voters rolls 90 days before an election.
The DOJ launched a similar lawsuit against Alabama over the removal of illegal migrants from voter rolls on Sept. 28.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=cab8e6dbf33a470f80775566290f3097&ei=36
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Virginia on Friday over an executive order removing illegal migrants off the state’s voter rolls allegedly too close to Election Day.
Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed Executive Order 35, which codifies election security measures including voter list maintenance, on Aug. 7. The lawsuit alleged the Virginia State Board of Elections and Virginia Commissioner of Elections Susan Beals violated the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which says states may not clean up voters rolls 90 days before an election.
The DOJ launched a similar lawsuit against Alabama over the removal of illegal migrants from voter rolls on Sept. 28.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=cab8e6dbf33a470f80775566290f3097&ei=36
Ratickle
Founding Member / Super Moderator
Just when you thought you'd heard it all, Oregon comes up with even more idiocy.....
Boss Put On Leave For Allegedly Prioritizing Candidates’ Qualifications Over Gender Identity
A controversy over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has surfaced within the Oregon Department of Forestry, after an official was placed on administrative leave for his hiring choices.
Megan Donecker, the former DEI strategy officer within the department, had filed a formal complaint against her boss Mike Shaw.
She accused him of looking beyond gender and identity while hiring and choosing candidates that were most qualified for the job.
Entire Article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...1&cvid=8d7f26e7dad64636b6ad465b23d5e548&ei=50
Boss Put On Leave For Allegedly Prioritizing Candidates’ Qualifications Over Gender Identity
A controversy over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has surfaced within the Oregon Department of Forestry, after an official was placed on administrative leave for his hiring choices.
Megan Donecker, the former DEI strategy officer within the department, had filed a formal complaint against her boss Mike Shaw.
She accused him of looking beyond gender and identity while hiring and choosing candidates that were most qualified for the job.
Entire Article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...1&cvid=8d7f26e7dad64636b6ad465b23d5e548&ei=50
Similar threads
