River over a River Bridge

But the best is a river lift that rotates!

falkirk_wheel.jpg

falkirk_wheel_02_570.jpg


http://www.thefalkirkwheel.co.uk/
 
Does the boat add to the weight?

I would think that the boats actually reduce the weight on the pillars. Aren't the boats displacing water away from the bridge, while not adding weight themselves?

If an airplane was on a giant treadmill....................:sifone::sifone::rofl::rofl:
 
Britain has several Aqueducts where their canal system crosses a river

most date back to around 1800
 

Attachments

  • aqueduct.jpg
    aqueduct.jpg
    286.5 KB · Views: 11
  • Pontcysyllte1_580579a.jpg
    Pontcysyllte1_580579a.jpg
    71.6 KB · Views: 4
  • pontcysyllte-aqueduct-from-south-east.jpg
    pontcysyllte-aqueduct-from-south-east.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 5
Weight should be the same with or without boats.

Quoted from "How Stuff Works"

An object in a fluid experiences an upward force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object. So if a boat weighs 1,000 pounds (or kilograms), it will sink into the water until it has displaced 1,000 pounds (or kilograms) of water. Provided that the boat displaces 1,000 pounds of water before the whole thing is submerged, the boat floats.
 
I guess I was thinking more of the river lift pic. Correct....on the bridge the water would be displaced out into the canal and off the bridge, but the "lift" in post 7 would weigh more with a boat in it.
 
Back
Top