Reactive Attachment Disorder

jayboat

Banned
great. lock my damn thread while I'm typing a post. too bad some people only know how to have a discussion by getting pizzed at any little perceived slight.

Here is a great re-cap from Alaska Dispatch of all the mind-numbing history of this bimbo you will ever need to know.

It's long on facts and short on f-bombs. :ack2:
Some slices:

After watching Sarah think for the past three years, my view it is that her big decision to quit was the logical result of several smaller decisions. Like a Slinky flopping methodically down a flight of stairs, each of those decisions flowed one after the other from Sarah's realization at the conclusion of the 2008 presidential campaign that she had transcended politics. That thanks to media like People Magazine and the National Enquirer, she now is playing way above the rim with cultural icons like Paris Hilton and the recently deceased Michael Jackson, rather than below it with common vote-grubbing politicians like Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney.
***
As Lyda Green and Gary Stevens, the past and present Republican presidents of the Alaska Senate will tell you, Lyda publicly, Gary more privately, Sarah Palin's tenure as Governor of Alaska has been a disaster. And a majority of the other members of the Alaska Legislature, Republican and Democrat, liberal and conservative, alike, will tell you that Sarah has next to no interest in public policy and knows next to nothing about the nuts and bolts of governing. And what's worse, she has no interest in learning.
***
In any event, she can spin it however she wants. But Sarah Palin is not quitting because Andree McLeod and other Alaskans have hounded her out of office by filing ethics complaints. The closest Sarah's come to admitting her true motivation happened on Monday when, while holding court on the beach at her husband Todd's fishing site in Dillingham, she told the national press corps that "when all these lawmakers are lining up for office their desire would be to clobber the administration left and right so that they can position themselves for office" and that "I'm not going to let Alaskans go through a year of stymied, paralyzed administration and not getting anything done."

Translated from Palinese, what Sarah said was that the real reason she is quitting is that she understands that she's lost control of the Alaska Legislature, a majority of whose members are fellow Republicans, many of whom hate her guts.
 
So can we continue "the thread" here? :D

offshoredillin said:
Very True, but this is america where it was founded on one being able to pratice his own religion. that being said, I think Obama being elected has broken down the barriers, if a black man can be president why cant a Mormon? especially one that has been a govener in a state that has never prospered and made it prosperous. Kennedy gets credit for the healthcare corrections that went on in Mass, but Mitt Romney had just as much if not more to do with it, as gov, his budget was in charge of it.

Same goes for Newt, he was considered a rebel back in the day, but his books and speeches since he left being speaker of the house, have proven that his ideology works.

My hope for america is this; Socialism isnt the answer, can we help people? yes, but those same people have to want to help themselves, I think, as simple as it sounds that gov should be run like a business, and Clinton had to shut it down, because it wasnt profitable, GW didnt, nor did his Father or Reagan. Obama has blown through his money, and now is looking to replenish the only way they legally can, by taxing the workers and companies, it's a cash cow. Whereas as a business we all know instead of taking more in times of crisis, we should cut back. this administration hasnt.

I very much hope that BO's "success" is that voters will be less interested in a nominee's personal religion and more focused on his/her potential. When I say that voters don't need religion, I don't mean from an atheist point of view, but from a "I believe in mine, you believe in yours, let's move on to more important matters of the national interest."

Starting next year, we really need people that are going to stand up and fight to stop the spending. It will be a Sisyphean battle until there is a wholesale flush, a Congressional cleansing as I like to say, and non-lifers are elected to office. You want to talk about serving your country? Outside of military service, being a publicly elected official can be one heck of a way to support your country. I'm not talking life-long politician; I'm saying no more than 6-8 years. Look at some of the space cadets that are in office now...it can't really be that hard. :D
 
Jay - do you know alot of politicians personally? You need to get a grip on the fact that maybe 5% of them have ANY CLUE in life. The other 95% have one common trait: The ability to suck up and kiss a$$ to the people with money that will donate to them. Understand that the donor would probably make a more capable, more intelligent, better candidate. But, Frankly, he is too bust making money and having a good life to work for what elected jobs pay. Thats why the 95% that are clueless have an elected position: To do the bidding of the smarter, more productive people.


I have people ask all the time why I won't run for Judge. I tell them I can't afford the paycut. Then I send out some campaign donations.

So don't make fun of how dumb or ridiculous Palin or someone else is... We non-elected officials already know we are not dealing with the cream of the crop. Don't let stupidity get to you.:USA:
 
Both the above posts make tons of sense, but when politician became a way of living as opposed to being a "statesman" thats where it took a wrong turn.
A statesman donated his time to the betterment of the colonies and civilization, because he had the ability to be a free thinker and grow things, life has workers, life has bosses, both are respectable in their fields, their is no one common class, it goes way back and as far as insects. Lifes pecking order shouldnt be so easily thrown aside. In life the weak/poor are taken care of by the strong/rich, however they shouldnt be used as tools of prey. Politicians use the massive numbers of weak/poor for votes...and that is one of the problems.
When a statesman is done helping his country, he went back to his business to make a living, our congress votes themselves raises while people are being laid off...hmmmm
 
Jay - do you know alot of politicians personally? You need to get a grip on the fact that maybe 5% of them have ANY CLUE in life. The other 95% have one common trait: The ability to suck up and kiss a$$ to the people with money that will donate to them. Understand that the donor would probably make a more capable, more intelligent, better candidate. But, Frankly, he is too bust making money and having a good life to work for what elected jobs pay. Thats why the 95% that are clueless have an elected position: To do the bidding of the smarter, more productive people.


I have people ask all the time why I won't run for Judge. I tell them I can't afford the paycut. Then I send out some campaign donations.

So don't make fun of how dumb or ridiculous Palin or someone else is... We non-elected officials already know we are not dealing with the cream of the crop. Don't let stupidity get to you.:USA:

I'm not making fun of her- there are plenty of others around to do that.

My point is the lunacy of the politics and politicians that had the cynicism to choose her worthless azz in the first place.

* go read the article I've linked in the first post, it will open your eyes.
 
I'm not making fun of her- there are plenty of others around to do that.

My point is the lunacy of the politics and politicians that had the cynicism to choose her worthless azz in the first place.

Tough not to agree, but some out there really thought she got the party motivated again. Anyway, I would rather discuss the future, she's through as far as Presidential or Vice-Presidential aspirations.
 
Politicians use the massive numbers of weak/poor for votes...and that is one of the problems.

I'll take that one a step farther;

Politicians purposely do everything they can to create weak/poor/needy, WHO CAN VOTE, to put them and keep them in office......:boxing_smiley:
 
My point is the lunacy of the politics and politicians .
isn't this how BO got elected?? are you really that paranoid and insecure of her that your spending every day of your life with this?? get help..

your photographic talents, as phenominaly talented pieces as they are, and I sincerely mean that, are undershadowing your hatred here..
 
isn't this how BO got elected?? are you really that paranoid and insecure of her that your spending every day of your life with this?? get help..

your photographic talents, as phenominaly talented pieces as they are, and I sincerely mean that, are undershadowing your hatred here..

I don't hate her, and I can assure you I'm not the least bit paranoid or insecure or whatever you think I am.

I happen to think this is a huge story and I'm interested in it. To compare this vapid, incurious know-nothing to Obama is ludicrous, but that's just how you wingnuts roll.

I also think mccain and his enablers should be held accountable for this irresponsible choice- they nearly took this country off a cliff.

You're saying that because my political views differ from yours that it affects people's attitudes about my photos? Project your values on someone else, willya? I will not adjust what I say to try and win some popularity contest.

That's for politicians. :)
 
isn't this how BO got elected?? are you really that paranoid and insecure of her that your spending every day of your life with this?? get help..

your photographic talents, as phenominaly talented pieces as they are, and I sincerely mean that, are undershadowing your hatred here..
I dont think he is paranoid, he is just pointing out fact on a politician. which as time goes on some of it is true and many of us on here have done the same to other politicians I happen to think she has good policies on gov working, however I don't agree with her religious views.

Once again I reiterate don't f up a good thread just because someone has a diff opinion on something. Jays talents as a photographer have zero to do with his political views,you shouldn't have brought that up, stick to the topic, not the person that writes it.
 
I also think mccain and his enablers should be held accountable for this irresponsible choice- they nearly took this country off a cliff.

Okay, you gotta explain a little of that......

The only way I see merit in that, they were such a poor team to put up against the Obama train (after the Bush destruction), their loss may still take us off a cliff.

Even if the two of them had been elected, certainly they could have done nothing worse than what is being done to us now?
 
Okay, you gotta explain a little of that......

The only way I see merit in that, they were such a poor team to put up against the Obama train (after the Bush destruction), their loss may still take us off a cliff.

Even if the two of them had been elected, certainly they could have done nothing worse than what is being done to us now?
I agree, if that were the case we are due some reperations for kerry and Gore...lol
 
I happen to think this is a huge story and I'm interested in it.
what story are you interested in?? what's the HUGE story here? you keep stating that, but we've yet to see a story that's HUGE.... fill us in here... nobody seems to know but you... unless you can do that then this entire topic is an exaggeration of nothing.., and vapid (your word) Palin bashing has no merit.. for the record, I don't think she is POTUS or VPOTUS material, but I do NOT think she justifies what you write... no woman does.... welp, maybe Pelosi does... i'm wayyyyyyy more concerned about Pelosi, and you SHOULD be as well

Once again I reiterate don't f up a good thread just because someone has a diff opinion on something. Jays talents as a photographer have zero to do with his political views,you shouldn't have brought that up, stick to the topic, not the person that writes it.
your right, I apologize for that reference. :seeya:
 
what story are you interested in?? what's the HUGE story here? you keep stating that, but we've yet to see a story that's HUGE.... fill us in here... nobody seems to know but you... unless you can do that then this entire topic is an exaggeration of nothing.., and vapid (your word) Palin bashing has no merit.. for the record, I don't think she is POTUS or VPOTUS material, but I do NOT think she justifies what you write... no woman does.... welp, maybe Pelosi does... i'm wayyyyyyy more concerned about Pelosi, and you SHOULD be as well

your right, I apologize for that reference. :seeya:
no prob, :D...and youre correct as well. its a topic that people are going to bring up because she was likable. horrible politician? not the worst, but certainly time has shown her weakness. Her abrupt changes are leaving people guessing and in Washington thats not a good thing.
I agree 100% on Pelosi, she is in more of a position to do more damage to the US than any other. I see Hillary fading away, quietly.
 
what story are you interested in?? what's the HUGE story here?


The "HUGE" story is the left's continued obsession with a politian who lost a vice presidentail election bid. Nothing more than stratigic deflection from the Obama and Congress continued and rapid destruction of a nation.
 
The "HUGE" story is the left's continued obsession with a politian who lost a vice presidentail election bid. Nothing more than stratigic deflection from the Obama and Congress continued and rapid destruction of a nation.
Amen on that...
 
jay..why stop there. we have a president who has broken most if not all campaign promises with trillions of debt to come with very little time outside the chicago housing authority who has paid millions of his campaign funds to surpress and hide everything he has done and written about for the last 10 years. if thats not enough to scare your pants off what will ?? these are scary scary times.
 
Back
Top