Yes, but part of the savings in Soc medicine come from poor health care and HUGE waits for care in many cases. My Great Aunt was turned away three times for eye surgery in Montreal and when she made it in the fourth time they said "Sorry, too far along, can't operate" Voila, no big expense there. Then she breaks her hip in a fall, rushed to the Emerg Room, Doc looks her over and says "Just bruised, rest up, here's some Tylenol" 36 hours later she's in a coma from blood loss because of the break, damn near lost her then too. I recently ruptured my Distal Bicep tendon, I was X-rayed and MRI'ed the next day, diagnosed and operated on in the space of ten days. This is very important because the tendon will shrink requiring a graft if the surgery is more than 2 weeks out. There is a forum for this injury (whoda thought!) and we have members from Canada and the UK that are waiting as much as 90 days for an Xray or MRI, then another 90 for surgery. And of course if a graft has to be done the cost of the surgery goes almost triple and the repair is approximately 20% more likely to fail or have complications. So there may be savings, but at what cost? If we go to a Soc system of health care like our more enlightened neighbors and allies, where will the rest of the world go for quality health care then?