Buoy
Founding Member
I know I haven't been around much lately, but I also know when I'm questioning certain things, we can have a good discussion/debate/arguement(civil) on questionable topics.
I have a customer that called me, and wants me to remove an item from their home (a PERMANETLY installed item) because the home is being foreclosed, and they want to take it with them.
Ethically/Morally, I'm having a problem with this.
My argument is - this isn't a cheap item (~$1200-$5000+). And it is an add-on, non-essential item to the home.
In my opinion, this PERMANETLY installed item is now a part of the home. The owner spent $$ on this that they could have used to make the mortgage, instead of having the bank REPO now. I feel the item now is part of the home, and belongs to the bank now (at least ethically/morally).
I'm open for debate - or if anyone that wants discuss has further questions of the circumstances.
I have a customer that called me, and wants me to remove an item from their home (a PERMANETLY installed item) because the home is being foreclosed, and they want to take it with them.
Ethically/Morally, I'm having a problem with this.
My argument is - this isn't a cheap item (~$1200-$5000+). And it is an add-on, non-essential item to the home.
In my opinion, this PERMANETLY installed item is now a part of the home. The owner spent $$ on this that they could have used to make the mortgage, instead of having the bank REPO now. I feel the item now is part of the home, and belongs to the bank now (at least ethically/morally).
I'm open for debate - or if anyone that wants discuss has further questions of the circumstances.