Why is it that everyone seems to think taking more away from working Americans to pay for things for those who do not work, or currently pay, fo them is a good thing. It's the number one problem in this country.
QUOTE]
I haven't read all of your posts, but will later today. i really do enjoy debating this with you and hope we will keep it going so we both reach better enlightenment.
In the meantime, your question here seems almost rhetorical. For the simple answer is by installing aconsumption tax in stead of an income tax, we remove the agrument of taking from the worker and giving to the non-worker. The non-worker would pay taxes if every item they buy has an imbedded tax associated with it.
Let's not assume any who doesn't work, but get government cheese is simply living off the fat of the gov't. They are the drug dealers, loan shark, criminal mind, black market retailers, etc that simply operate int eh parallel economy that does not tax it's workers. If we stop relying on the people who play by the rules to fund our government and start relying on anyone (legal, illegal, criminal, etc) who consumes to pay their fair share, we will have a huge increase in tax revenue. Hell, they can even reduce our property taxes significantly because of it.
The people who game the system for HI coverage would be paying when they buy gum, condoms or whatever else they buy. (Lamborghini with drug money).
So instead of fearing change, we should be looking at the opportunity. I'd rather Comrade Stoli pays a higher tax on the stuffed animal at Disney so Florida can drop the property tax millage rate.
I'll read more and offer thoughts. But if we are step back from the tree and look at the forest (or is that Forrest :sifone

we are all talking about the same thing. Less money out of my pocket and more from the people who are getting free benefits from the government.