about snopes

you guys should really get a clue and look beyond tunnelvision.

3. Obama didn't set out to use the internet to win the election.

Actually, according to his campaign managers, he did. He hit the ground running with almost 2 million volunteers and the expectation to raise a billion dollars from his internet donations.

His campaign had reviewed both the original McCain internet plan and the more recent one by that idiot who became their democratic party national manager.
 
As long as Wikipedia got to the bottom of it. :)

I hope you posted that in humor. Much the info posted on Wikipedia is so rediculously wrong that its laughable. But hey, I seen it on the intonet so it must be true right. :sifone:
 
I think we are thinking just a bit different, what I was implying was the original idea was to get elected, not "I want to use the internet to get elected"

i.e: I want to win the election, how are we going to do this? what are the most effective marketing/fund raising tools available?
 
I think we are thinking just a bit different, what I was implying was the original idea was to get elected, not "I want to use the internet to get elected"

i.e: I want to win the election, how are we going to do this? what are the most effective marketing/fund raising tools available?

Gotchya
 
The One won the election on one basic tactic... good donor relations. I will look for the research and post it. The fact that he used technology well was actually secondary to good old fashioned donor relations. The guys who did the research studied what happened after a person made a donation in the case of all four primary candidates.

The best: Obama. Average time to first thank you was like one minute. Average thank you's per gift was like 10. In every email was a "donate 5$ now" button. Email or text contacts were followed by emails and texts from various people in the campaign. Donors received info before the media. Donors received emails and texts from "Barack" including a thank you right before he accepted the nomination. Good news and bad news alike was shared along with a soft ask or call to action.

The worst: McCain. A donation was followed by a letter in the mail about two to three weeks later. No additional contact.

As a professional fund raiser, I can tell you that the Obama team had their act together. The only problem is that we accidentally elected him president because he was a good fund raiser and now we are stuck with him. To bad he isn't as masterful of a leader as he was a fund raiser. Or, maybe we can start asking him to raise his own money whenever he wants to invite people to Washington for a beer because he became involved in something that was none of his business. Oh wait. He is a black man. Anything about any black man is automatically his business. My bad.
 
It took many in the party until 2004/2005 to realize that Dubya was an idiot. I think I'll give the O man at least until one year in office to say anything. If his mistakes are public, and he admits one or two, we'll have improved 100% in that regard.

But people now are still acting as puppets of the parties. The Dem and Rep bloggers and pundits wake up everyday wonder what to feed the idiots. Raw meat or sewage today? The utter irony here is the subject of this thread.
 
The One won the election on one basic tactic... good donor relations. I will look for the research and post it. The fact that he used technology well was actually secondary to good old fashioned donor relations. The guys who did the research studied what happened after a person made a donation in the case of all four primary candidates.

The best: Obama. Average time to first thank you was like one minute. Average thank you's per gift was like 10. In every email was a "donate 5$ now" button. Email or text contacts were followed by emails and texts from various people in the campaign. Donors received info before the media. Donors received emails and texts from "Barack" including a thank you right before he accepted the nomination. Good news and bad news alike was shared along with a soft ask or call to action.

The worst: McCain. A donation was followed by a letter in the mail about two to three weeks later. No additional contact.

As a professional fund raiser, I can tell you that the Obama team had their act together. The only problem is that we accidentally elected him president because he was a good fund raiser and now we are stuck with him. To bad he isn't as masterful of a leader as he was a fund raiser. Or, maybe we can start asking him to raise his own money whenever he wants to invite people to Washington for a beer because he became involved in something that was none of his business. Oh wait. He is a black man. Anything about any black man is automatically his business. My bad.

Surely you aren't suggesting that smart planning, organization and execution could have had ANYTHING to do with his winning the election? or conversely, anything to do with McLame's losing it?

As far as someone getting involved with something that was none of his business, I got one friggin word for ya: IRAQ.
 
Back
Top