2 Socialists and a secret handshake!

Cuda,

I think he is just trying to jerk your chain. :(

Ya think? He's been spouting his crap for years. He's been banned from more boating sites than Carter has little pills. I have to agree on the secret handshakes for his komrads in arms.
 
jesus...this is like phucking kindergaten... my bikes better than your bike... oh yeah...your still on training wheels sucker... am not.. are too... am not... are too.. well Im the rubber your the glue...... yeah you eat glue... sooo what your mom lives in a shoe... yeah well i got some ice cream, and you can't have any cuz your moms on welfare and your dadys an alcoholic....

Kind of like the French in Monty Python and the Holy Grail:sifone:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V7zbWNznbs
 
sooo what your mom lives in a shoe...



yeah well i got some ice cream, and you can't have any cuz your moms on welfare and your dadys an alcoholic....



Did the thread change direction?????

Yo Momma's so fat, she.........:sifone:
 
Nah let him rant. He's just mad his party couldn't field a good enough team to win a high school election much less POTUS.

Now see, there's the main issue....


As was so aptly put by a British historian,


This is the inevitable consequence of inadequately constrained democracy, as illustrated by the British historian, Alexander Tytler, in his lifecycle of civilizations. ”A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”


It's not that the team wasn't good enough, it's that over half of the voters in the election were only voting to get themselves bigger handouts with little, or no, effort put into earning those handouts.
 
Anyway, I'd like to see the Constitution amended so you can't vote if you pay zero taxes.
 
It's not that the team wasn't good enough, it's that over half of the voters in the election were only voting to get themselves bigger handouts with little, or no, effort put into earning those handouts.


You do realize that's a racist statement, don't you?
 
Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.


Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.

Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.
 
Now see, there's the main issue....


As was so aptly put by a British historian,


This is the inevitable consequence of inadequately constrained democracy, as illustrated by the British historian, Alexander Tytler, in his lifecycle of civilizations. ”A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”


It's not that the team wasn't good enough, it's that over half of the voters in the election were only voting to get themselves bigger handouts with little, or no, effort put into earning those handouts.

You do realize that's a racist statement, don't you?

Not in any way, shape, or form. There was not a single reference to any race in it. To be over half the population, race logically could not be included in the last election.

Race issues are a necessary crutch to some who have no logically pertinent facts to support an otherwise irrelavent argument. I have, and never will use that tactic. People like Obama, Hillary, Rice, Albright, Powell, and many others have proven beyond all logical thought that race, and sex, no longer are pertinant to anyone's capability to succeed in this country. What other country can make that same argument?
 
Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.


Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.

Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.

Churchill had some of the best ones.....


Winston Churchill:

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
 
Not in any way, shape, or form. There was not a single reference to any race in it. To be over half the population, race logically could not be included in the last election.

Race issues are a necessary crutch to some who have no logically pertinent facts to support an otherwise irrelavent argument. I have, and never will use that tactic. People like Obama, Hillary, Rice, Albright, Powell, and many others have proven beyond all logical thought that race, and sex, no longer are pertinant to anyone's capability to succeed in this country. What other country can make that same argument?
Nice try but I'm not buying what you're selling. White people have always looked at blacks as being lazy, good-for-nothing loafers with their hands out begging for a handout. Your post is a classic example of that view.
 
It's not that the team wasn't good enough, it's that over half of the voters in the election were only voting to get themselves bigger handouts with little, or no, effort put into earning those handouts.


You do realize that's a racist statement, don't you?


I know it's difficult for you.... medication and therapy might help. Please try and follow the following equation..

black trash = trash
white trash = trash
yellow trash = trash
red trash = trash
brown trash = trash
+ blue trash = + trash
____________ __________
ALL races trash = trash


All races choosing to be lazy while smoking crack, drinking moonshine on the porch, stealing hub caps, having children with no regards to their upbringing, refusing education, refusing to seek gainful employment, subsisting on welfare, handouts and crime = trash

Please point out to me exactly where the racism lies in this equation??

If you would like, please provide me your general geographic location, so that I may research accredited higher learning facilities for you. School really isn't that difficult if you apply yourself, and you may also realize increased self-esteem as your knowledge base grows. Should you need to obtain your GED prior to enrolling, I believe there are "programs" available to assist you with that also.

As your education progresses, you may find your views on the world in general may change. DO NOT PANIC! This is normal, and will serve to illustrate that you cognitive abilities are increasing.

Soon you will begin to understand what must underachievers do not...

While many falsely believe that the school of life provides an excellent education, it does not (with very few exceptions).

The school of life's teaches repeatedly how to deal with failure.

The school of education teaches you how to succeed repeatedly.
 
Nice try but I'm not buying what you're selling. White people have always looked at blacks as being lazy, good-for-nothing loafers with their hands out begging for a handout. Your post is a classic example of that view.

Actually, it's not. If you can't see it, it points to the main problem I addressed in my quote.

If you want my true opinion on the group looking for the biggest handouts and not caring about the future, look into the AARP.......
 
Nice try but I'm not buying what you're selling. White people have always looked at blacks as being lazy, good-for-nothing loafers with their hands out begging for a handout. Your post is a classic example of that view.

HA!!! I have said repeatedly, that the 'stereotypical' gangbanging, crack dealing black youth have tremendous aptitude..they just need to learn to apply it. Somewhere in their minds is a tremendous skill to understand economics and it's correlation to supply and demand. One must understand the volume of crack needed to supply the neighborhood, one must succesfully navigate a treachourus supply chain to obtain the commodity, one must understand paackaging and redistribution, one must be able to constantly interput market fluctuations to determine base pricing as well as pricing updates. one must also be able to evaluate profit margins to extract as much profit as possible from the commodity while keeping a loyal customer base. They also must be able to observe for changes in market demands from one drug to another and rapidly adapt to the changing market.

As for the welfare recipient, try figuring out one government program to the point of understanding that one may maximize use. These people have figured out how to maximize benefits from a host of programs, they have figured out how to react rapidly to changing rules. They must posses a knowledge of the stacks of paperwork required by several different govt. agencies, while being able to fill the paperwork out completely,and directing their answers towards their objective. this must all be done rapidly and accuretly to avoid and delays in benefits.


If only the leadership of GM had these traits and characteristics, the company would be controlling the marketplace and making money like mad.
 
Now see, there's the main issue....


As was so aptly put by a British historian,


This is the inevitable consequence of inadequately constrained democracy, as illustrated by the British historian, Alexander Tytler, in his lifecycle of civilizations. ”A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”



It's not that the team wasn't good enough, it's that over half of the voters in the election were only voting to get themselves bigger handouts with little, or no, effort put into earning those handouts.

Or, as Ben Franklin said:


Any government strong enough to give you everthing you need, is strong enough to take away anything you have.
 
Or, as Ben Franklin said:


Any government strong enough to give you everthing you need, is strong enough to take away anything you have.

Now I get to pick on you for something I pick on others about.

That statement has been used as a quote by many. Jefferson, Franklin, etc.

It was actually made by Ford in a joint session of congress.
 
Nice try but I'm not buying what you're selling. White people have always looked at blacks as being lazy, good-for-nothing loafers with their hands out begging for a handout. Your post is a classic example of that view.


And there in a nutshell is the Democrats view of their guaranteed black voter block. Your deep rooted belief is that if you promise handouts, they will always pull the D lever. You Cat are the transparent racist here and you should be ashamed. Your party has done more to keep blacks in poverty and under the thumb of government than any other entity. Deal with it, you're racist because you look for the racism in any statement or action. And BTW, black comprise 10-12% of the population, so that means by talking about "over half the voters" he was talking about 40% of all other races, not any racism there. Finally your "comrades in arms" post is like saying you have a Jewish accountant, so you must like Jews-assinine all the way.
 
and there in a nutshell is the democrats view of their guaranteed black voter block. Your deep rooted belief is that if you promise handouts, they will always pull the d lever. You cat are the transparent racist here and you should be ashamed. Your party has done more to keep blacks in poverty and under the thumb of government than any other entity. Deal with it, you're racist because you look for the racism in any statement or action. And btw, black comprise 10-12% of the population, so that means by talking about "over half the voters" he was talking about 40% of all other races, not any racism there. Finally your "comrades in arms" post is like saying you have a jewish accountant, so you must like jews-assinine all the way.

+ 1
 
Now I get to pick on you for something I pick on others about.

That statement has been used as a quote by many. Jefferson, Franklin, etc.

It was actually made by Ford in a joint session of congress.

It may have actually been him. Unlike Cat, I go by memory, and not just cut and pasted. I'm SURE I read it was BF, but I didn't bother to verify my sources. :)
 
Back
Top