It's news in the industry/hobby. I'm sure Jason or Matt will probably report on it on speedonthewater.com. What is the harm of a boater posting about it? Oops! Forgot. This is SOS. Puppydogs and lollipops only. Sunkin blinders stardard issue for all!! Poof! I'm banned! Lol!!!!Hi Ed. Welcome back after such a long time. That was an important post, I guess.
I have a question that maybe you can answer. Or maybe someone else can help.
Like you, I don't have a Pantera. I don't have a Pantera on order. I don't have plans to order a Pantera. I don't know the Nunez family. I have never met them. We have never had any business dealings. I've never given or received advice from them. I don't know Berk. I've never vouched for them, nor have they vouched for me. I have never visited their shop or even set foot on a Pantera. Other than the fact that I happen to be a boater, and they happen to build boats, we have no connection.
As a guy who happens to own a boat, what is my responsibility as far as "saving" the rest of the boating public from this business, which is technically none of my business? As a boater, am I obligated to spread the word? If I do not spread the word that Pantera has filed, am I an enabler? Am I guilty of fraud due to my resistance to jump on a bandwagon? To what extent are offshore boaters (and fish boats too) obliged to participate in the "warning phase," "celebration of failure," "make sure to kick them wherever they appear," and "I told you so" activities? I am trying to think of a hobby that has such a seemingly strong requirement for uninvolved people to take active roles in the informing, persecuting, educating, flaming, ridiculing, of strangers for the good of that hobby.
Is this a function of social media and the internet driving public opinion and fueling the fires of self-appointed guardians of the public trust? Or is it an actual ethical obligation that a mariner must participate in without fail? Having no dog in this fight, and simply observing the choices, statements and actions of others who have no dog in this fight, I have to wonder.
It's news in the industry/hobby. What is the harm of a boater posting about it?
It's news in the industry/hobby. I'm sure Jason or Matt will probably report on it on speedonthewater.com. What is the harm of a boater posting about it? Oops! Forgot. This is SOS. Puppydogs and lollipops only. Sunkin blinders stardard issue for all!! Poof! I'm banned! Lol!!!!
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy is a restructuring of debt proceedure. Maybe they can pull through this, before submission to Chapter 7 full bankruptcy. This economy is relentless. Hope it turns around soon.
BUMMMERR
![]()
Nothing it all. Just do it as a new topic.
Here I will help you guys.
Who else is down there who knows a lot about the boat building industry, and has a stellar reputation? Anyone come quickly to mind?
Hi Ed. Welcome back after such a long time. That was an important post, I guess.
I have a question that maybe you can answer. Or maybe someone else can help.
Like you, I don't have a Pantera. I don't have a Pantera on order. I don't have plans to order a Pantera. I don't know the Nunez family. I have never met them. We have never had any business dealings. I've never given or received advice from them. I don't know Berk. I've never vouched for them, nor have they vouched for me. I have never visited their shop or even set foot on a Pantera. Other than the fact that I happen to be a boater, and they happen to build boats, we have no connection.
As a guy who happens to own a boat, what is my responsibility as far as "saving" the rest of the boating public from this business, which is technically none of my business? As a boater, am I obligated to spread the word? If I do not spread the word that Pantera has filed, am I an enabler? Am I guilty of fraud due to my resistance to jump on a bandwagon? To what extent are offshore boaters (and fish boats too) obliged to participate in the "warning phase," "celebration of failure," "make sure to kick them wherever they appear," and "I told you so" activities? I am trying to think of a hobby that has such a seemingly strong requirement for uninvolved people to take active roles in the informing, persecuting, educating, flaming, ridiculing, of strangers for the good of that hobby.
Is this a function of social media and the internet driving public opinion and fueling the fires of self-appointed guardians of the public trust? Or is it an actual ethical obligation that a mariner must participate in without fail? Having no dog in this fight, and simply observing the choices, statements and actions of others who have no dog in this fight, I have to wonder.
Ed,
I moved your thread. I didn't want to discredit your input, but at the same time I did not want your link to change the direction of the thread. It has become a lesson in history I have enjoyed and I felt it is a shame for the recent events to change the direction of the thread.
I moved it with out prejudice and did not intend to hinder the discussion. I wished only to extend Pantera the respect they deserve for sharing their rich history with us and thought the discussion should take place in a different thread.
I own a Fountain, I raced against Pepe and Jo. I am old school and thought a different thread was in order.
I guess I was surprised to see you in the old neighborhood. I couldn't remember a single connection to Pantera that you could have had to make this an issue of such personal importance to you that you would break your long silence. I find the dynamics of interpersonal communication in the world of social media to be interesting, especially in the past two years. Your post made me wonder about the expectation of the sport in regard to the individual boater and the obligation to parrot these public service warnings. I think that the internet draws people into issues that they would have otherwise no connection with, and kind of saw this as an example. I suppose the the answer to my question is that you feel a personal responsibility. Clearly it was not the opportunistic drive-by hijacking that it appeared to be when I read it. Perhaps it is newsworthy enough to warrant its own thread. While I am highly doubtful that the 8 people who post on this forum and the 180 who lurk were considering buying a new Pantera, there always could be that one guy from a far away country or something who doesn't have google. I'll accept your suggestion that the post was 100% altruistic "public service" and 0% salt on a wound.First, I like the way my post was moved from the "Inside Pantera" thread to this new thread created by someone within Serious Offshore. My post in was to inform the public that Pantera is filing bankruptcy. Per the viewable existing court records Pantera has had a long trail of unpaid bills and extremely late deliveries of customer boat. Since this is a performance boating site I feel it is important that potential Pantera customers know the legal action occurring.
Now for whoever moved my post from the original position to here ........ you lack professional skills.
ed