fund razor
Founding Member
The carry weapon equipment debate
My dad, my buddy and I are all going to take the CCW class.
We are all three shopping for good carry weapons.
All three of us are familiar with guns. My dad has never owned a semi-auto handgun but he has fired some of mine at the range. His current handgun is a bad carry choice (large frame .38 revolver) my current handgun is a bad carry choice (large frame .40 semi-auto). I owned a 9mm for a long time.
I am not as accurate with hand cannon sized caliber guns as I am with smaller caliber guns. I can put a 9mm round in the middle of a match target at 50 feet. A 44 magnum or a 45 acp, not so much. I can hit the paper though. A carry-sized weapon will probably even have a shorter barrel than what I am used to shooting.
The debate revolves around carry caliber. Many say that you should carry a 45, so that you have the maximum stopping power. I am wondering whether a smaller caliber would be a better choice for me (and maybe my dad) because of the ease of carry, light weight, and better accuracy. I mean... if I can dot an i with a 9mm, but my groups expand beyond 3-5 inches with a 45, doesn't it stand to reason that I should carry what I am most accurate with to begin with, since shooting under stress will further reduce my potential accuracy?
He was looking at a semi-auto in a .380 caliber. My concern with that was availability of ammo.
My dad, my buddy and I are all going to take the CCW class.
We are all three shopping for good carry weapons.
All three of us are familiar with guns. My dad has never owned a semi-auto handgun but he has fired some of mine at the range. His current handgun is a bad carry choice (large frame .38 revolver) my current handgun is a bad carry choice (large frame .40 semi-auto). I owned a 9mm for a long time.
I am not as accurate with hand cannon sized caliber guns as I am with smaller caliber guns. I can put a 9mm round in the middle of a match target at 50 feet. A 44 magnum or a 45 acp, not so much. I can hit the paper though. A carry-sized weapon will probably even have a shorter barrel than what I am used to shooting.
The debate revolves around carry caliber. Many say that you should carry a 45, so that you have the maximum stopping power. I am wondering whether a smaller caliber would be a better choice for me (and maybe my dad) because of the ease of carry, light weight, and better accuracy. I mean... if I can dot an i with a 9mm, but my groups expand beyond 3-5 inches with a 45, doesn't it stand to reason that I should carry what I am most accurate with to begin with, since shooting under stress will further reduce my potential accuracy?
He was looking at a semi-auto in a .380 caliber. My concern with that was availability of ammo.