Let me see if I have this correct: SBI makes a deal with CBS to carry the races, etc on a weekly basis.
(Normally, networks pay the promoters for the rights to carry the races, but in this case, it sounds like SBI had to pay CBS to carry the races. That's curious.)
SBI was behind on their payments most likely because they lack the money. SBI gets Geico to make a generous contribution, most likely to get featured airtime on the CBS programming. However, SBI doesn't use the money to shore up their obligation to CBS (which still doesn't make sense.). Now Geico, who like anyone, can turn on a TV and see that the races were not broadcasted, finds out that SBI never paid CBS. So Geico has to sue SBI. Does this sound like an accurate depiction?
I'm not making any speculations, just trying to understand the flow.