new star trek movie

We watched it last night and I loved it.Might be because I am a long time fan of the original TV series and the early movies. Never cared for the later re-incarnations.Someone who is not familiar with the TV series would not pick up on some of the parallels ,like some of McCoy's remarks,Kirk's sometimes off the wall actions,Spock's emotional side,etc. Even the green skinned woman has a connection to the original tv pilot with Pike. Of course you may also be an old fan like me and hated it for the same reasons I loved it.:cheers2:
 
Watched it for the first time on blue-ray, absolutely loved it and I have been watching Trek since show #1.

Beats all the other Trek movies hands down and has me thirsting for more.
 
Only issue I had was Spock's mother dying,as she was in a TV eposide and a movie,both were in the future. Writers got some 'splainin to do on that detail.We hard core fans demand historical accuracy.:cheers2:
 
i am not a treky but i watched t in blue-ray with a good sound system and i liked it. When the ship went to warp speed it would make you jump even if you knew it was coming
 
I was a big fan of the original series, I just thought it jumped around to much. I did like the McCoy character. the bad guy's looked like rock stars.
 
Only issue I had was Spock's mother dying,as she was in a TV eposide and a movie,both were in the future. Writers got some 'splainin to do on that detail.We hard core fans demand historical accuracy.:cheers2:

The whole movie is based on a changed timeline, which pretty much covers any future inconsistencies:cheers2:

This has been the subject of much debate, here are some answers.

http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-takes-place-alternate-timeline-vic-4546/

"Anyway, here’s the summary of the whole thing in bullet point form:

•Q: Why do some things appear different in the new Star Trek movie?
•A: There is an alternative timeline created by Nero traveling back in time.
•Q: Is everything different in the alternative timeline?
•A: No, some things remain the same.
•Q: Does this alternative timeline wipe out the original timeline (from TOS – Nemesis)?
•A: No, quantum theory says they both co-exist.
•Q: Does the original timeline continue?
•A: Yes, again as explained by quantum theory.
•Q: Does this quantum theory approach conform to ‘Trek science?’
•A: Depends on the episode, but it is explicitly cited by Data in the episode “Parallels.” "
 
The whole movie is based on a changed timeline, which pretty much covers any future inconsistencies:cheers2:

This has been the subject of much debate, here are some answers.

http://screenrant.com/star-trek-movie-takes-place-alternate-timeline-vic-4546/

"Anyway, here’s the summary of the whole thing in bullet point form:

•Q: Why do some things appear different in the new Star Trek movie?
•A: There is an alternative timeline created by Nero traveling back in time.
•Q: Is everything different in the alternative timeline?
•A: No, some things remain the same.
•Q: Does this alternative timeline wipe out the original timeline (from TOS – Nemesis)?
•A: No, quantum theory says they both co-exist.
•Q: Does the original timeline continue?
•A: Yes, again as explained by quantum theory.
•Q: Does this quantum theory approach conform to ‘Trek science?’
•A: Depends on the episode, but it is explicitly cited by Data in the episode “Parallels.” "

that last hurricane did a lot more damage than we thought
 
My DVD has an extra, Deleted Scenes.They cut the funniest scene,Kirk walks up to this green woman and starts profusely apologizing to her for using her to gain information.He goes on and on and she has this blank look on her face. Kirk then looks at her closer and says "You're not Gail,are you?" She says no ,and walks away. Hilarious. Sounded like something Shatner would have said.:cheers2:
 
Back
Top