Headlines
Old posts about APACHE
- Thread starter cashbrain
- Start date
- Status
fund razor
Founding Member
hmmmmm:USA::leaving:
fund razor
Founding Member
fund razor
Founding Member
somewhere in here we passed the cig section in posts
fund razor
Founding Member
ok, i give up.
Originally Posted by tonto in 2004
From what I understand, and anyone can correct me, was that cashbrain (Jack L[edit]) fraudulently sold the "APACHE" name and ALL its rights to Thad, who subsequently sued Mr.McManus for the rights.............................and lost
Total Bullchit..Robert doesn't have a clue
Originally Posted by offshore steve in 2004
Not quite the way Bob S tells the story. According to Bobby and this is going from memory so I do not state this as fact, as long as Bobby was building boats he had the right to use the name. No name was sold or rights to it in the Thad deal if that was the case. In order for Thad to win the recent case Bobby would of at least had to be actively involved in building boats with him or for him to even stand a chance in court.
Sounds like the only thing sold was a misunderstanding.
I have enjoyed my conversations with both Bobby and Mark and know that if you sat down with each of them and had a little knowledge of trademarks, you would understand this alot more.
For now, good luck to both Bobby and Mark in their future endeavors
Also,more Bullchit....all the know-it-alls. Funny thing is that attorneys did this deal,were paid ALOT of money to do it, and they still screwed it up.
Is there a reason that you are posting this stuff up here? Not one of these guys had ANY clue what happened. It is all BS talk out of their AZZES.
Gotta Luv the internet trolls:icon_bs:
From what I understand, and anyone can correct me, was that cashbrain (Jack L[edit]) fraudulently sold the "APACHE" name and ALL its rights to Thad, who subsequently sued Mr.McManus for the rights.............................and lost
Total Bullchit..Robert doesn't have a clue
Originally Posted by offshore steve in 2004
Not quite the way Bob S tells the story. According to Bobby and this is going from memory so I do not state this as fact, as long as Bobby was building boats he had the right to use the name. No name was sold or rights to it in the Thad deal if that was the case. In order for Thad to win the recent case Bobby would of at least had to be actively involved in building boats with him or for him to even stand a chance in court.
Sounds like the only thing sold was a misunderstanding.
I have enjoyed my conversations with both Bobby and Mark and know that if you sat down with each of them and had a little knowledge of trademarks, you would understand this alot more.
For now, good luck to both Bobby and Mark in their future endeavors
Also,more Bullchit....all the know-it-alls. Funny thing is that attorneys did this deal,were paid ALOT of money to do it, and they still screwed it up.
Is there a reason that you are posting this stuff up here? Not one of these guys had ANY clue what happened. It is all BS talk out of their AZZES.
Gotta Luv the internet trolls:icon_bs:
Hey Fund..You think I need to defend this BS stuff? Hardly...
btw...This one IS true !!
Originally Posted by cashbrain in 2004
Mr. Saccenti signed over the rights that he owned to me,legitimately...if Mr. McManus wants to challenge me,he'll lose...no fraud, no Bs..just alot of name sayers like Tonto causing a problem and full of BS.....NEXT !!!
McManus had zero chance to get the rights until I spoke to his attorney..
What don't you ask him? or better yet, his attorney :bump:
btw...This one IS true !!
Originally Posted by cashbrain in 2004
Mr. Saccenti signed over the rights that he owned to me,legitimately...if Mr. McManus wants to challenge me,he'll lose...no fraud, no Bs..just alot of name sayers like Tonto causing a problem and full of BS.....NEXT !!!
McManus had zero chance to get the rights until I spoke to his attorney..
What don't you ask him? or better yet, his attorney :bump:
fund razor
Founding Member
i thought that it was a thread about old apache posts and wanted to help.
:cheers2:i thought that it was a thread about old apache posts and wanted to help.
AWWW...Thanks ! I really appreciate the old BS untrue statements that you were able to dig up...:cheers2:
fund razor
Founding Member
i'll stop. sorry found posts looking for posts. we could ask a mod to poof.
fund razor
Founding Member
probly not cool to plunder the old site anyway. i'm done.
Darn...just when we were starting to have fun :ack2: :smash:
ApacheCarl here, Jack you are so full of it, the mind boggles. Thads lawsuit against McManus concerning the ownership of the Apache mark was dismissed by a Federal judge many years ago. Thads claim to the Apache mark was your "assignment" of the mark to him. Lets take, for atleast the fifth time, a trip down memory lane. Thad, with your assignment is the Plaintiff. Here's the money quote from the Right Honorable Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp, thats "Your Honor" to a legal degenerate such as yourself :“Had Plaintiff performed a reasonable inquiry into the “Assignment” itself and the circumstances surrounding its alleged execution, the fraudulent nature of the document would have become evident immediately,” That was 2004, after 5 years I would have thought somebody would have upped your meds and this delusion would have faded. Give it a rest.
- Status
Similar threads
