Feds to 60 Million American Anglers: We don't need you

Playn

New member
We're the Obama administration.....you will fall in line! The next 3 years can't come soon enough..





Feds to 60 Million American Anglers: We don't need you
IRVINE, Calif. USA – October 5, 2009 – A recently published administration document outlines a structure that could result in closures of sport fishing in salt and freshwater areas across America. The White House created an Interagency Oceans Policy Task Force in June and gave them only 90 days to develop a comprehensive federal policy for all U.S. coastal, ocean and Great Lakes waters. Under the guise of ‘protecting’ these areas, the current second phase of the Task Force direction is to develop zoning which may permanently close vast areas of fishing waters nationwide. This is to be completed by December 9, 2009.


Dave Pfeiffer, President of Shimano American Corporation explained, “In spite of extensive submissions from the recreational fishing community to the Task Force in person and in writing, they failed to include any mention of the over one million jobs or the 6o million anglers which may be affected by the new policies coast to coast. Input from the environmental groups who want to put us off the water was adopted into the report verbatim – the key points we submitted as an industry were ignored.”

Recreational fishing generates a $125 billion annual economy in the United States and supports jobs in every state according to government figures. Through the Sport Fish Restoration program, anglers have provided more than $5 billion through excise taxes on fishing tackle to fishery conservation and education for decades.

In addition to the economic aspects, anglers lead the nation in volunteer conservation efforts on behalf of improving fish habitat, water quality and related environmental areas. “There was no mention of the fishery conservation efforts which anglers have led for over 50 years in every state – an environmental success story that has no equal in the world”, said Phil Morlock, Director, Environmental Affairs for Shimano. “The Task Force did not make any distinction between the dramatic differences between harmful commercial fishing harvest methods and recreational fishing, even though we spelled it out for them in detail,” added Morlock.

Claiming to be the result of a public consultation process the report states, “Having considered a broad range of public comments, this report reflects the requests and concerns of all interested parties.”

The original White House memo and not surprisingly the Task Force report contains multiple references to developing a national policy where Great Lakes and coastal regions are managed, “consistent with international law, including customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea” - a 300-page treaty the U.S. has never ratified.

“We question what implications there will be for state authority and jurisdiction in the Great Lakes and coastal regions if the U.S. adopts the U.N. Treaty,” said Pfeiffer.

The report makes it clear that future authority for implementing the policy for coastal and inland waters will fall under White House jurisdiction with a new National Ocean Council comprised of over 20 federal agencies at Cabinet Secretary or Deputy Secretary level. No reference to Congressional jurisdiction is indicated.

“This significant change in U.S. policy direction is the result of a 90-day fire drill process as ordered by the President that, not surprisingly, lacks balance, clarity and quality in the end product,” said Morlock. “People who simply want to take their kids fishing on public waters deserve better from their government,” he added.

Shimano is joining with other members of the recreational fishing industry to urge anglers to contact their members of Congress and the administration to request this process be required to adopt the economic, conservation and social contributions of recreational fishing as key elements of the policy. It is critical that we ensure Congressional oversight and state jurisdiction and management continues.
 
You'd think they'd work on creating jobs, not purposefully eliminating more...


My guess, it's racist. They don't like redneck fishermen, (isn't that a race?)......:sifone:
 
WTF will they think of next? I hope this gets shoved so far back up his dumb azz, that he's got fish coming out his Spock ears. :rolleyes:

What idiocy!
 
Hell, you can even fish in Russia. What's this country coming to?
 

Attachments

  • putinfishing.jpg
    putinfishing.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 3
Nobody is saying what the changes might really be. Does this concern over-fishing, fishing in spawning grounds, endangered species?

I am not aware of any international regs that limit sport fishing except in the instances mentioned above.

That is true. It's more writing on the wall at this point, however, thus far the report does nothing to address any opponent point of view (fisherman in this case), only environmental concerns, and we've all seen where environmental policy has gone in the U.S. in the last 30 years...We are left with little to enjoy. Wait until someone decides that boat exhaust noise disrupts some stupid birds migratory patterns and we're dealt another blow to enjoying our freedoms on the water.
 
I speed read the report and got this

The Task Force’s suggested implementation strategy identifies the following nine priority objectives that our Nation should pursue to implement the National Policy.
• Ecosystem-Based Management: Adopt ecosystem-based management as a foundational principle for the comprehensive management of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes.
• Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning: Implement comprehensive, integrated, ecosystem-based coastal and marine spatial planning and management in the United States.
• Inform Decisions and Improve Understanding: Increase knowledge to continually inform and improve management and policy decisions and the capacity to respond to change and challenges. Better educate through formal and informal programs the public about the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes.
• Coordinate and Support: Better coordinate and support Federal, State, tribal, local, and regional management of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes. Improve coordination and integration across the Federal Government, and as appropriate, engage with the international community.
• Resiliency and Adaptation to Climate Change and Ocean Acidification: Strengthen resiliency of coastal communities and marine and Great Lakes environments and their abilities to adapt to climate change impacts and ocean acidification.
EOP | INTERAGENCY OCEAN POLICY TASK FORCE 8
INTERIM REPORT OF THE INTERAGENCY OCEAN POLICY TASK FORCE
• Regional Ecosystem Protection and Restoration: Establish and implement an integrated ecosystem protection and restoration strategy that is science-based and aligns conservation and restoration goals at the Federal, State, tribal, local, and regional levels.
• Water Quality and Sustainable Practices on Land: Enhance water quality in the ocean, along our coasts, and in the Great Lakes by promoting and implementing sustainable practices on land.
• Changing Conditions in the Arctic: Address environmental stewardship needs in the Arctic Ocean and adjacent coastal areas in the face of climate-induced and other environmental changes.
• Ocean, Coastal, and Great Lakes Observations and Infrastructure: Strengthen and integrate Federal and non-Federal ocean observing systems, sensors, and data collection platforms into a national system and integrate that system into international observation efforts.
These priority objectives provide a bridge between policy and specific actions, but do not prescribe in detail how individual entities will undertake their responsibilities. Instead, the NOC would develop strategic action plans for each of the priority objectives, focusing on key areas identified by the Task Force. This would allow adequate time to fully consider the necessary details for implementation, and, as appropriate, to coordinate with States, tribal, and local authorities, regional governance structures, academic institutions, non-governmental organizations, and private enterprise.
Conclusion
The Task Force is pleased to submit this interim report and fulfill the first part of its charge. Having considered a broad range of public comments, this report reflects the requests and concerns of all interested parties. Though the main focus of the Task Force now turns to developing a framework for coastal and marine spatial planning, due to the President by December 9, 2009, the Task Force anticipates that this interim report will continue to be refined as the Task Force receives further thoughtful input from stakeholders. With this continued public participation, the Task Force will be able to provide the President with the best possible final set of recommendations.

and this:

The Plan Should Address:
• Expansion of the national framework for coastal and marine spatial planning developed by the Task Force;
• Specific time frames for implementation;
• Geographic limits, use of the best available science, protection of ecosystem integrity (e.g., biological diversity, fish and fish habitat), the management of trade-offs, with recognition of uncertainties in decision-making, and provisions for adaptive management; and
• An approach that balances competing uses, including traditional, new, and expanding uses (e.g., energy, aquaculture), minimizes impacts on coastal and ocean ecosystems, ensures sustainable uses under reasonable changes in environmental conditions, and minimizes costs.

and this

Areas in numerous bays, estuaries, gulfs, and the Great Lakes are now consistently low in or lacking oxygen, creating dead zones along our bays and coasts. Unsustainable fishing (e.g., overfishing) remains a serious concern with consequences for marine ecosystems and human communities. In the Arctic, environmental changes are revealing the vulnerability of its ecosystems. These changes are increasing stressors and impacts on the ecosystems, people, and communities in the region, and are presenting new domestic and international management challenges

Commercial fisherman should be concerned about this, but they are part of the problem also IMO.
 
Just another way for the Fed to grab power from the states. I am afraid the fisherman aren't going to be the only ones effected by this. By the time it's done it will include all waters in the US. and apparently the land around the water.

A quote from the Whitehouse report:

"Water Quality and Sustainable Practices on Land: Enhance water quality in the ocean, along our coasts, and in the Great Lakes by promoting and implementing sustainable practices on land."

I am all for protecting the enviroment but at what cost?
 
My hat is off to Shimano, this is great PR for them regardless:sifone:
 
Last edited:
Just another way for the Fed to grab power from the states. I am afraid the fisherman aren't going to be the only ones effected by this. By the time it's done it will include all waters in the US. and apparently the land around the water.

:icon_bs::icon_bs:

But what will happen when global warming melts all of the glaciers and Waterworld becomes a reality??? How will we eat?? I've gotta give Kevin Costner a call and get his take on this!!:biggrinjester:
 
:icon_bs::icon_bs:

But what will happen when global warming melts all of the glaciers and Waterworld becomes a reality??? How will we eat?? I've gotta give Kevin Costner a call and get his take on this!!:biggrinjester:

I need another foot or so of water in front of my father's bayfront house, then I could get my boat into his dock!:sifone:
 
I need another foot or so of water in front of my father's bayfront house, then I could get my boat into his dock!:sifone:


If we could get another 10 feet or so, Old School and I will both have waterfront homes :sifone:
 
Back
Top