When Judge Rhenquist wrote his majority opinion affirming the practice of DUI checkpoints, he paid particular emphasis to stating his opinion that the overwhelming public good brought by finding and removing drunk drivers from the highways outweighed the imposition being placed upon those being screened (paraphrasing- I could Google the exact text). I didn't write the law, but I'm somewhat familiar with it, as well as those other Supreme Court decisions that apply to traffic stops.
I don't agree with him and I know from the statistics compiled and the discussions with LEO's that they don't work and that they're rarely employed in a fashion that might make them effective. They do them around here at 8PM on friday in the downtown areas. If they did them a 2AM in areas where bar saturation was higher or by larger clubs, I'm sure they would be more effective- but they're not.
As far as this being a good traffic stop- the officers owed the individual no particular level of courtesy nor are they required to process the stop with any particular speed or efficiency. For all any of us knows, there may have been communication issues or dispatchers occupied with more urgent calls. The key here is the word "reasonable". There are no specific laws or rules written here. Many departments have guidelines that they expect theirt officers to adhere to so that if the issue of "reasonable" is questioned at trial, it can be defended and their charges against you protected.
X-rated- You may have missed that it would have been completely legal for the officer to arrest this young man, tow his vehicle and do an extensive inventory search simply on the expired plates issue. He could have spent the night and seen the judge in the nmorning about bail. I for one am glad we have officers out there keeping an eye out for all our safety. And writing a complaint is going to do absolutely nothing. If you were a citizen of the community and contacted the mayor or councilman you might get some lip service. But otherwise your opinion matters not. That's just reality.
I don't agree with him and I know from the statistics compiled and the discussions with LEO's that they don't work and that they're rarely employed in a fashion that might make them effective. They do them around here at 8PM on friday in the downtown areas. If they did them a 2AM in areas where bar saturation was higher or by larger clubs, I'm sure they would be more effective- but they're not.
As far as this being a good traffic stop- the officers owed the individual no particular level of courtesy nor are they required to process the stop with any particular speed or efficiency. For all any of us knows, there may have been communication issues or dispatchers occupied with more urgent calls. The key here is the word "reasonable". There are no specific laws or rules written here. Many departments have guidelines that they expect theirt officers to adhere to so that if the issue of "reasonable" is questioned at trial, it can be defended and their charges against you protected.
X-rated- You may have missed that it would have been completely legal for the officer to arrest this young man, tow his vehicle and do an extensive inventory search simply on the expired plates issue. He could have spent the night and seen the judge in the nmorning about bail. I for one am glad we have officers out there keeping an eye out for all our safety. And writing a complaint is going to do absolutely nothing. If you were a citizen of the community and contacted the mayor or councilman you might get some lip service. But otherwise your opinion matters not. That's just reality.