Results 61 to 75 of 75
-
03-18-2010 11:56 PMSOS NINJA dancing on the boundaries of hell.
-
03-19-2010 08:49 AMNo Beaks, No Pads, No Steps, No Bull
-
03-19-2010 10:19 AM
Actually, I remember hearing that the Supreme Court ruled that it is an unreasonable expectation that law enforcement officers prevent crime. (ie: protect you during the commission of a crime against you) They ruled that law enforcement is not a preventative, but an investigative initiative.
Maybe speeding is one of the few things that they can prevent.
-
-
03-19-2010 03:01 PM
Eggzachary.
And in my county.... castle doctrine has been the rule of the day. There have been a half dozen of these defensive shootings in the last two months and they have all been cleared... even two guys shot in the back as they ran. Even when the defending homeowner had 200 pot plants. (He was charged for the pot, not for the killing if the intruder.)
-
03-22-2010 08:09 AM
Here ya go, this explains it all. Get used to it.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/03/21...est=latestnews
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 4,796
03-22-2010 09:29 AMIf you're driving 100 on an interstate, you should receive a ticket. There's no excuses.
But there are many situations that are unreasonable.
My kids went with some friends midnight skiing last winter. Started at 10, ended at 3AM. Didn't want them out driving on a Saturday night, so I took them. There's a road that cuts down off the divided highway to the resort. It's a rural area. Speed limit is 45. But, the road goes into a township and drops to 30. Now here it is, 2:30 AM on Saturday night. There are 50 bars within a 5 mile radius that just disgorged all of their die-hards out onto our roadways and there's a sheriff running radar on this little rural road. Do you thing there was any correlation about a slippely little speed drop and a ski resort full of kids closing shortly?
I was speeding. If I'd have fought the ticket, the judge would have still fined me. But wouldn't the public's interests been served better sitting by bars than by a speed trap?
-
-
03-22-2010 09:59 AM
The public's interests would have been better served if the officer were/was conducting a DUI/DWI but that takes alot of time: first there is the stop of the car-checking tags and license, field sobriety test, transport to police station, and the breath test at the police station, and all forms-reports. In the same amount of time he may write three to five speeding tickets (potentially), much easier to do, less headache, and easy money for the community (most people plead guilty). And not having to deal with drunks and their drunken personality(s).
When you do fight back-a speeding ticket, you may get a reduced fine, or your speed lowered which mean your point assessment may be lowered (In New Jersey 1-14 mph over the posted limit is a two point offence, 15-29 mph over is a four point offence, 30 mph and above is a five point offence). If you are charged with doing somewhere between 1-4 mph over the limit, I can see why a person woukld just pay the ticket and not fight it. Otherwise, if you can take the time to attend court do so, get a downgrade, or if it is a hefty fine or serious matter spend the $300+ for a lawyer (typical charge for representing a client charged with speeding). You will more than save that amount in the future (auto insurance) if you can reduce the potential points assessed.
-
03-22-2010 11:08 AM
The Governor doesn't make laws... maybe a bit of understanding of the Government would help you.
As far as the ticket goes... you have to pay to play. If you don't want to pay for a ticket or the fines then don't speed. I'm not some stupid 'speed kills' person either. But speed differential is an issue. running well over 30 MPH faster than the surrounding cars that probably are not expecting it is not safe. you just don't know what the other guy is going to do.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 4,796
03-22-2010 11:14 AMNo kidding. I almost died last night. A moment of inattention at 70 and an old man on the interstate, in the dark, with a taillight out, at 40MPH. I can't believe I didn't roll the Ex.
-
03-22-2010 11:33 AM
They are putting up cameras here. I think the funny thing is that they don't cost the town to do it !! A private company installs them , maintains them , mails you a ticket , and collects a commision !!!!! I wish I owned a few of them for gas money !!! It's staggering what revenue these things make.
Sorry Gino but can't offer any good advise here. I did at one time have 54 points so I have a bad track record as a kid.
-
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- ft.myers
- Posts
- 187
03-22-2010 11:35 AMI don't think either understand the law, that's why there is a class action suit against the excessive fines placed on motorcycles and not cars. Discriminatory practices signed into law by charlie, started by the rep. from ft. lauderdale. And your right I don't understand the goverment because 90% of their decisions don't make any sense.
-
-